owiseone23

owiseone23 t1_jac29v1 wrote

it's not uncommon for traits to evolve across "fitness valleys". That is, a trait with positive fitness that requires multiple generations to evolve with intermediate generations having negative fitness.

With a large population and a lot of time, random variation makes it possible to evolve across fitness valleys.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2711507/

2

owiseone23 t1_jac139q wrote

it's not uncommon for traits to evolve across "fitness valleys". That is, a trait with positive fitness that requires multiple generations to evolve with intermediate generations having negative fitness.

With a large population and a lot of time, random variation makes it possible to evolve across fitness valleys.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2711507/

1

owiseone23 t1_jac0yw0 wrote

it's not uncommon for traits to evolve across "fitness valleys". That is, a trait with positive fitness that requires multiple generations to evolve with intermediate generations having negative fitness.

With a large population and a lot of time, random variation makes it possible to evolve across fitness valleys.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2711507/

9

owiseone23 t1_jac0w3l wrote

That's not quite true. I work on mathematical models of evolutionary processes and it's not uncommon for traits to evolve across "fitness valleys". That is, a trait with positive fitness that requires multiple generations to evolve with intermediate generations having negative fitness.

With a large population and a lot of time, random variation makes it possible to evolve across fitness valleys.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2711507/

9