> if the company still changes the naming principle.
How does this make sense:
> Kuo claims that the Largan periscope unit costs only $4. In addition, at such a price, the company allegedly cannot make a profit from this direction.
Why is the low cost of the unit an impediment on making profit? Are they trying to say that Apple is only willing to pay $4 for the unit?
pgriss t1_jec6dlq wrote
Reply to Periscope “telephoto” only for those who buy the most expensive iPhone. A well-known analyst revealed details about the new iPhone 15 Pro Max camera by chrisdh79
Was this article written by AI?
What does this mean:
> if the company still changes the naming principle.
How does this make sense:
> Kuo claims that the Largan periscope unit costs only $4. In addition, at such a price, the company allegedly cannot make a profit from this direction.
Why is the low cost of the unit an impediment on making profit? Are they trying to say that Apple is only willing to pay $4 for the unit?