pm_me_your_pay_slips
pm_me_your_pay_slips t1_iybpgrm wrote
Reply to comment by ThisIsMyStonerAcount in [D] I'm at NeurIPS, AMA by ThisIsMyStonerAcount
Flo-rida and the intel nerds trying to be cool unveiling what looked like a GPU was definitely a low point
pm_me_your_pay_slips t1_iybpai1 wrote
Reply to [D] I'm at NeurIPS, AMA by ThisIsMyStonerAcount
Which are the best parties this year?
pm_me_your_pay_slips t1_iy2twej wrote
Reply to comment by mg31415 in [R] QUALCOMM demos 3D reconstruction on AR glasses — monocular depth estimation with self supervised neural network processed on glasses and smartphone in realtime by SpatialComputing
You need to do feature computation and find correspondences. If you’re using a learned feature extractor, that will be twice as expensive as the monocular model. But let’s say you’re using a classical feature extractor. You still need to do feature matching. For dense depth maps, both of these stages can be as expensive, if not more, than a single forward pass through a highly optimized mobile NN architecture.
pm_me_your_pay_slips t1_ixzf29m wrote
Reply to comment by Zeraphil in [R] QUALCOMM demos 3D reconstruction on AR glasses — monocular depth estimation with self supervised neural network processed on glasses and smartphone in realtime by SpatialComputing
You can put that compute on the glasses. The real problem is heat dissipation. It is what killed google glass.
pm_me_your_pay_slips t1_ixz544s wrote
Reply to comment by carbocation in [R] QUALCOMM demos 3D reconstruction on AR glasses — monocular depth estimation with self supervised neural network processed on glasses and smartphone in realtime by SpatialComputing
One camera is cheaper than two, though. Cheaper in every sense (compute, memory, network bandwidth, energy consumption, parts cost, etc).
pm_me_your_pay_slips t1_ixy6we8 wrote
Reply to comment by putsch80 in Returning to normal relations with Russia would be a mistake, says Lithuanian president by hieronymusanonymous
Don’t forget to add the people who got into the war and will want to pull out when it gets too expensive.
pm_me_your_pay_slips t1_iw2rjru wrote
Reply to comment by kymsan in [D] Current Job Market in ML by diffusion-xgb
Ask your friends who were laid off at Meta, in the past couple months, who is hiring them with the same compensation they were getting at Meta, or better.
pm_me_your_pay_slips t1_iw1dzkk wrote
Reply to comment by Top-Perspective2560 in [D] Current Job Market in ML by diffusion-xgb
“A bit more competitive” is an understatement. There’s an increased supply of workers and an increasing number of them are lowering the expectations about compensation. Companies that are hiring will have many options, and they’ll likely chose the option that costs them less.
pm_me_your_pay_slips t1_ivai3l1 wrote
Reply to [R] Reincarnating Reinforcement Learning (NeurIPS 2022) - Google Brain by smallest_meta_review
I THOUGHT REWARD WAS ALL YOU NEED
pm_me_your_pay_slips t1_irw5s8a wrote
Reply to comment by freezelikeastatue in [D] Looking for some critiques on recent development of machine learning by fromnighttilldawn
What are those errors you have observed in the datasets like the Pile?
pm_me_your_pay_slips t1_ir79lnv wrote
Reply to comment by maxToTheJ in [R] Discovering Faster Matrix Multiplication Algorithms With Reinforcement Learning by EducationalCicada
They know deepmind papers bring in readers.
pm_me_your_pay_slips t1_iqsuta1 wrote
Reply to [D] Types of Machine Learning Papers by Lost-Parfait568
My first ML paper
pm_me_your_pay_slips t1_iz358y7 wrote
Reply to comment by Ulfgardleo in [R] The Forward-Forward Algorithm: Some Preliminary Investigations [Geoffrey Hinton] by shitboots
Do you mean that his algorithms don’t converge?