pton12

pton12 t1_j64qf13 wrote

It isn’t though, because in representative democracy, there’s not a perfect reflection of community wishes and how the representative acts. I doubt local people prefer zero affordable housing units to 300.

There’s also a big gulf between Robert Moses running roughshod over everything and this level on NIMBYism. The fact is, as a society, we need things (whether sanitation, affordable housing, etc.) and they need to go somewhere. People often don’t want them nearby, but if everyone gets their wish, the society doesn’t get anything. This isn’t about an individual development, per se, but the idea that a single council member can stop much needed development in this instance or others, the whole city be damned.

10

pton12 t1_ixd397r wrote

Gonna be honest, I’m amazed at the strides T-Mobile has taken in the last 15 years. I first got it because it was a heck of a lot cheaper than AT&T, but there were enough gaps in coverage in suburban NJ and parts of NYC that I kinda understood why I was paying less. Now, I have better coverage than my wife who is on Verizon in most places, and I get significantly better international perks (which we use frequently enough that it’s meaningful). Bravo, T-Mobile!

19