regberdog
regberdog t1_ir0ab8t wrote
Reply to comment by soynadie-66 in /r/philosophy Open Discussion Thread | October 03, 2022 by BernardJOrtcutt
did you read the book, or did you literally read the title and just imagine that that's all there was to it.
literally 4 second google says they care about humanist values in an evolutionary context. Context =/= values.
wait... do you think no one who believes that natural selection exists can have morals. ffs.
regberdog t1_ir0a7v1 wrote
Reply to comment by Particular-Alfalfa-1 in /r/philosophy Open Discussion Thread | October 03, 2022 by BernardJOrtcutt
holy crap that reply you got is messed up, and it's upvoted. is this sub always so bad?
regberdog t1_ir0a5xy wrote
Reply to comment by soynadie-66 in /r/philosophy Open Discussion Thread | October 03, 2022 by BernardJOrtcutt
this is so bad man holy crap. please read some philosophy, please.
Racism is not the statement that "we are deserving of valued" it's the statement that "they are not deserving of being valued".
It's the opposite thing, and it's incoherent. Where as the humanist says human life is valuable, the racist says that human life is and is not valuable.
regberdog t1_ir2obog wrote
Reply to comment by Particular-Alfalfa-1 in /r/philosophy Open Discussion Thread | October 03, 2022 by BernardJOrtcutt
Sorry I thought you had half a brain. And also I did.