rolyfuckingdiscopoly
rolyfuckingdiscopoly t1_je90aup wrote
Reply to The shorter your personal language is, the more likely a computer can impersonate you by Option_Null
I guess I don’t understand how my personal language could be long or short
rolyfuckingdiscopoly t1_je8zk10 wrote
Reply to comment by BringMeInfo in does anyone like roald dahl's short stories by EatLikeAHippo
I had to stop reading them before bed! They’re legitimately unsettling. It’s fun!
rolyfuckingdiscopoly t1_jd6h7ib wrote
Reply to comment by reallyrelevanttothis in TIFU by taking a dump in her old toilet by Ninjaxas
Idk if the knife could have helped here, man
rolyfuckingdiscopoly t1_jcxcx48 wrote
Reply to comment by Least-Media in TIFU by opening my waterbottle at work by MoonTearChild
No exploding pink drinks!
rolyfuckingdiscopoly t1_jbsbd9o wrote
Reply to comment by LifeOfAPancake in There is nothing to say about truth, admits Simon Blackburn. Here he presents the deflationist approach to truth – one that aims to put an end to the search for a theory of truth, which Blackburn now recognises is futile by IAI_Admin
An interesting question is: why does the truth have to be immediately useful? Why would it be that truth must benefit you, or me, or any of us?
And- if it must be useful— is it not useful to have an idea, an inexact but working model, of the way the world exists independent of ourselves?
rolyfuckingdiscopoly t1_jbm4xgk wrote
Reply to comment by scarymaxx in WingBot almost killed me. I can’t recommend it strongly enough. by scarymaxx
This is my favorite response
rolyfuckingdiscopoly t1_jbijiar wrote
Reply to comment by LifeOfAPancake in There is nothing to say about truth, admits Simon Blackburn. Here he presents the deflationist approach to truth – one that aims to put an end to the search for a theory of truth, which Blackburn now recognises is futile by IAI_Admin
A truth that can never be known, though, is an assumption. The inability of you or me to know something to be true does not mean that another human, or another creature of a different kind, cannot know it. I think dismissing the value of truth “because we cannot know it”, and presuming it inaccessible, is kind of a reach.
rolyfuckingdiscopoly t1_j9r4csn wrote
Reply to comment by phistomefel_smeik in TIL that in 1554 Elizabeth Crofts hid in a wall on Aldersgate Street, where she pretended to be a heavenly voice. Reputedly 17,000 people came to listen to her give out anti-Catholic propaganda. by Kurma-the-Turtle
That’s so interesting! I love things like that. Language is so cool. Also words that look or sound like one you know in your language but aren’t related… I forget the term for them. But like avocat in French not being avocado lol. My Arabic teacher called them “false friends,” and I think it’s fun to try to trace connections to them anyway.
rolyfuckingdiscopoly t1_j75rjh8 wrote
Reply to comment by Mundane-Ad-3142 in Netflix Deletes New Password Sharing Rules, Claims They Were Posted in Error by echosayswhat
I mean, they can do whatever they want. So can I.
rolyfuckingdiscopoly t1_j6cco5m wrote
Reply to comment by gathermewool in TIFU by going above and beyond for a civilian drug screening and showing too much skin. by [deleted]
What do you mean? Curiosu
rolyfuckingdiscopoly t1_j2c77p7 wrote
Reply to comment by tina_marie1018 in Every year a new family joins our town. Something is not right with this one by likeeyedid
But the wounds weren’t fresh. Which means it’s been there a long time. Remember how Helen introduced them, as “Mary, Julia, and (pause) … and Charlie.”
rolyfuckingdiscopoly t1_j0apiq7 wrote
Reply to comment by Ramady in TIL that when Unsolved Mysteries aired a segment on missing child Nyleen Marshall, they were contacted by a man who thought he might have gone to school with Nyleen. This turned out not to be Nyleen, but a different missing child, Monica Bonilla, who had been abducted by her noncustodial parent. by TychaBrahe
Probly Mark Twain. He apparently said everything.
rolyfuckingdiscopoly t1_jeb50ig wrote
Reply to comment by Option_Null in The shorter your personal language is, the more likely a computer can impersonate you by Option_Null
Huh ok interesting. So if I’m speaking more formally and using words like antithetical and constituency, it’s harder for a computer to imitate than if I’m feeling more informal and saying things like “idk I can’t see it fsr but that’s cool tho”,? Is that correct? I’m interested why that would be; I know nothing about that type of thing. You’re also not required to explain; this is just a shower thought not “write a 5-paragraph essay”. I’m just curious.