samwell_4548
samwell_4548 OP t1_jeg7gxj wrote
Reply to comment by YakComplete3569 in Could Life extension help with demographic collapse? by samwell_4548
Thanks Elon?
samwell_4548 t1_jeg3685 wrote
How do we make it unbiased? We still have not figured out how to make algorithms unbiased.
samwell_4548 t1_jecmnfm wrote
Reply to comment by FormerHoagie in Is it possible that AI is already in control of our society. by Crazy-Mall-5301
Why would stopping change anything, if the companies that collect your data already know you looked up weird porn, stopping won't change that data.
samwell_4548 t1_jecmacd wrote
Reply to comment by AnonFor99Reasons in Is it possible that AI is already in control of our society. by Crazy-Mall-5301
But why would it subtly pull levels if it could get rid of us much quicker, I don't see the motivation in prolonging our existence from the perspective of an ai that seeks to get rid of us.
samwell_4548 OP t1_jebaqhv wrote
Reply to comment by Pikkornator in Could Life extension help with demographic collapse? by samwell_4548
Sure radiation could effect it but non-ionizing radiation would not.
samwell_4548 OP t1_jebajmi wrote
Reply to comment by dragoonts in Could Life extension help with demographic collapse? by samwell_4548
In what way?
samwell_4548 t1_jeashtb wrote
Reply to Thought experiment: we're only [x] # of hardware improvements away from "AGI" by yeah_i_am_new_here
One issue is that LLM's cannot actively learn from their surroundings, they need to be trained prior to use. This is very different to how human brains work
samwell_4548 t1_jeas2nq wrote
Reply to Human body growth by Sad-Fudge-6951
Genetics and nutrition are the key, many smaller nations have high average heights
samwell_4548 OP t1_jeardsm wrote
Reply to comment by Pikkornator in Could Life extension help with demographic collapse? by samwell_4548
Look there are endocrine disruptors around us, but the radiation that is produced by our mobile devices is non-ionizing. This means that it cannot destroy our dna. The real reason people aren't having children is not because they do not want to, many studies show most people want children, but because it is very expensive to have children. In our capitalist society, children do not act like free labor, they are a burden. Many people want children but their career and the cost of living get in the way. Younger people also don't want to have children as much because we live in an uncertain world where many people don't want to bring children into the world.
Submitted by samwell_4548 t3_126s1xg in Futurology
samwell_4548 t1_jegtqyz wrote
Reply to Why is Google AI so BAD compared to OpenAI?? by Malachiian
They're limiting Bard because AI models have misalignment issues and they want to make it safer.