skybluepink77

skybluepink77 t1_iu5xwcj wrote

They wouldn't need to have an attraction - that might complicate it too much - but it would be good if they had some sort of relationship...there didn't seem to be any reason, apart from a mix of ego and boredom, as to why they were 'duelling' anyway.

Morgenstern can't 'do' character, the only character who had a slight bit of personality was Friedrich, and she killed him off!

1

skybluepink77 t1_iu3jhoj wrote

Read it in my bookclub recently, and we all disliked it [I really disliked it, had to force myself to read it.]

I don't like books with circuses, clowns etc in anyway, so I started with a prejudice...

Like wading through a sticky sea of sugary, sickly frosting. Too much description, too elaborate, 1-dimensional boring characters, insta-love, anti-climatic ending, I could go on but you get the idea. A lot of people like it though, so that's fine. Just don't ask me to read it again, I'd rather stick pins in my eyeballs.

16

skybluepink77 t1_itglnh2 wrote

Of Clarke's two novels to date, one - Jonathan Strange - is sort of placed in the Napoleonic era [ but it is not an 'historical' novel] and Piranesi is contemporary [again, sort of.]

LOTR isn't really slice of life, but it's well-written. And of course, is the classic 'quest' story. So - it's whatever you want to go for!

1

skybluepink77 t1_itg4266 wrote

As a very rough guide, the more 'literary' the book is [rather than a book that's been designed to sit very happily on the fantasy shelf], the more unusual the book is and more willing it is to avoid the epic cliches/quest etc tropes.

So you could try 'literary fantasy/scifi'?

I know you don't want specific titles, but as I'm the same as you in that I don't want to read the same old cliches over and over, I'd go for an author like Susanna Clarke [eg Piranesi] which goes off on its own path. It's certainly slice of life but a very, very odd life!

1