So would the assumption be that losing weight via caloric restriction results in you producing less GLP-1 than normal? Which would explain how semaglutide induced weight loss doesn't?
Also your body reacts to hunger by shutting down, so you start burning less and you plateau. This does not happen if instead of hunger you feel full. Semaglutide slows the food passing through you so you feel full
So the idea is that it somehow blocks whatever hormones or whatever tell your body that you're starving when you lose weight the old fashioned way?
Yeah but everyone was talking about how great Prey is, and those animals were some of the worst CGI I've ever seen (and I'm not talking about explosions, I'm talking about a fake snake that would've been better if you'd used a rubber one).
slightofhand1 OP t1_jbu6e23 wrote
Reply to comment by Pikachorizo in If semaglutides just make you eat less, how can they not result in the same metabolic effects of weight loss via calorie restriction? by slightofhand1
So would the assumption be that losing weight via caloric restriction results in you producing less GLP-1 than normal? Which would explain how semaglutide induced weight loss doesn't?