sumquy
sumquy t1_jch044q wrote
Reply to "You don’t like it because you don’t get it, you don’t get it because you’re not ___________" by JohnTaylorson
not about books, but people say that to me every time i say that inception was stupid.
sumquy t1_j9vgvuu wrote
Reply to comment by Sunhating101hateit in eli5 how does light get reflected?does it get reflected in all directions or in the direction where it came?and does light gets weaker everytime it gets reflected i mean does the reflection gets weaker even time it also reflects? by Substantial-Drop-726
snorts in infrared
sumquy t1_j9n14rb wrote
Reply to Is Hannibal Lecter a villain or an anti-hero to you in the novel/film The Silence of the Lambs? and why? by pablohax
i think in the original novel he was a villain, but the movie portrayed him as more of an anti-hero. both book and film sequel treated him as an anti-hero.
sumquy t1_j8jqp9t wrote
Reply to Vancouver police officer guilty of assault with weapon in arrest of Black man stopped for jaywalking | CBC News by DieFlavourMouse
when you think it can't get worse...
>A spokesperson for the police department on Monday could not immediately confirm whether Sidhu will remain on duty.
sumquy t1_iydene1 wrote
there are two things going on here and they aren't really related except that they have the same solution. most "dirts" are oils, waxes, and greases. heat softens them and lets the soapy water slip in between the dirt and your skin more easily. it also destroys germs because they don't have a skin. they have a fatty membrane surround, so soap and the mechanical action of washing your hands literally tears them apart.
sumquy t1_iuigw8f wrote
not all life requires oxygen, for some organisms it is toxic. oxygen is an extremely corrosive chemical that gives off energy (exothermic) when you combine it with just about anything. it is very abundant on earth and in the universe, but not always in a form that can be easily accessed. interestingly, the first organisms on earth used sulphur, which is directly below oxygen on the periodic table, so a lot of similarities.
sumquy t1_je6k6lt wrote
Reply to ELI5: How are scopes (like for sniper rifles) accurate? by CRTScream
they are accurate because someone "zeroed" it in, or made it accurate. it is important to understand that that is only done at a specific range. for example, a rifle could be zeroed at one hundred yards, so if you want to hit something at that range, you would put the crosshair directly on it. if you want to hit something beyond that, you would need to use the stadia marks underneath the crosshair to aim above the impact point you want.