Lmao I love when idiots try and say you have to stop talking about something if they don't like it

Like an actual toddler screeching about vegetables

Good luck little dented skull

Unless you're making the very silly statement that because no one can do it, that it somehow changes the line of what is actually safe.. Then the same thing has been said and you're not actually arguing like you think you are.

Now, if you are saying that... Then you're having a different conversation and are either intellectually dishonest and trolling or just lacking in reading comprehension

Either way, the only actually objective safe value for consumption with lead is 0. Anything above that has risks involved period. We can't achieve 0 though, so there is nothing to do but determine a threshold that will be the most acceptable and that is determined by regulations. Since it's established we CAN'T, there is no other option. But there is still risks and is harmful regardless of regulation. Tangible evidence that any amount is still harmful and every decimal point above 0 that it is, the higher violence is in a community over decades. So...

If you're still struggling don't bother responding, I can't help you if that was too far above your head lol

I mean that doesn't mean the article is written well. Just means it doesn't have to be to make money. Which we've known for awhile.

Still OK to be annoyed by it.

Plenty of people disagree with you. It's officially used more than you seem to realize. It is the reality of it too. Like the words literally properly encompass what happened... If a species dies out... It lost. Period.

Is that not what they said? I think you interpreted it as somehow meaning "the genes themselves physically lost battles in expression" or something but I'm certain they're just talking about overall dilution over time for the reasons you said ad an example lol, since that is generally the thing like they said

How good something is shouldn't really determine if the attempt was in bad faith lol.. Doesn't mean it is, but that shouldn't be relevant by itself.

There are many sides to shit like this, it doesn't have to be a scenario where you can literally overlap the waveforms and not tell the difference for it to be illegal imitation.

Not as irrelevant as your education clearly.

Or an appeal to children lol.

What fucking world do you live in that even if we removed the court context here and just compared what someone would be more likely to listen to, an expert in one field talking about another, or a high school student.... And you're trying to say you'd be similarly impacted by the high schooler?

Do you even realize what you're saying?

Some weird vacuum you have created and it doesn't even work contained like that either... Genuinely flabbergasted, like how do you process this and then share it

This is the natural evolution of the angry dad yelling at the weather report, the toaster, the traffic...

Somehow the evolution is much worse and far less potential value

"my personal experience translates to everyone everywhere always"

Really impressive amount of ignorance