taradiddletrope
taradiddletrope t1_iyf081p wrote
Reply to The EU is looking at seizing $330 billion in frozen Russian assets and investing them — with any profits going to Ukraine by KeenlyFirst
Put it all in FTX.
/s
taradiddletrope t1_iy74l70 wrote
Reply to comment by thetensor in How FTX 'death spiral' spelled doom for BlockFi, according to bankruptcy filing by renome
Can we just have a major coin like ETH or BTC go to zero next?
taradiddletrope t1_iy2vk8f wrote
Reply to comment by iruleatlifekthx in How a CoinDesk scoop led to the fall of Sam Bankman-Fried and implosion of FTX by redhatGizmo
“Stricter on privacy” is not the same as untraceable.
Tons of mf’s in jail right now that committed crimes before DNA was used in crime investigations who got caught with DNA evidence.
taradiddletrope t1_j00cgg2 wrote
Reply to comment by daddicus_thiccman in China wants legal sector to be AI-powered by 2025 / Supreme People's Court issues directive for an artificial intelligence network to be in place by 2025 to support and enhance legal services by Sorin61
I’m not sure about China specifically, and I’m inclined to believe Chinese courts are severely compromised, but having a high conviction rate may not be unfair.
In 2012 the DOJ conviction rate was 93%. For a liberal state like California, the conviction rate was 72% in 2000.
They want plea bargains. By the time the DOJ indicts, the amount of evidence against you is so overwhelming that your chances of being acquitted are near zero. You’re better off pleading guilty to a lessor charge and taking your punishment.
If you do go to trial, well, that’s why the DOJ has a 93% conviction rate. You stand almost no chance by the time it gets to court.
If you had a slim hope, you would be offered a plea deal and the DOJ would rather avoid court entirely.