thesilversverker

thesilversverker t1_jdjr3q7 wrote

Why the shit you people talking -30 like it's at all common? Yea, cap drops there, but we might get 8 hours of -30 temps in a decade?

Checked mine - i'm still getting nearly 30k/36k at -15f, the record low point this winter. Which was like maybe 8 hours. Since we expect these temps, any competent installer would size for the realistic scenario.

1

thesilversverker t1_jde3kd4 wrote

> Anytime it was below 0 degrees the heat pumps could not keep up, they’d work but if set at 68 the space would be 58 and they were working hard

This means whoever sized your system did it incorrectly - same thing would happen with wood, natural gas, or oil.

1

thesilversverker t1_jde368m wrote

They become resistive electric heat around -5/-10.

They work just fine, but costs more. If you hire a joe blow to size and install, and they dont do a schedule J, they might undersize, leading to freeze.

If you've got a cheaper, non-variable $/BTU option, keep it for cold weather. We dont live in the UP tho, they're fine as your primary in maine.

1

thesilversverker t1_jcfwpeg wrote

> I would think that as a culture we see school sports as at least a 5% net positive or growth for adolescents.

I think you're right on this, as far as cultural perceived benefits.

Proving that our populace is bad at math, and should have played fewer sports.

50k in sports, 175k total students. We should disregard the minority interest, sports would need to be like a 17% bump to break even.

2

thesilversverker t1_jcfgau7 wrote

School sports arent important for their growth, and they are clearly less important for the student body than academics. You're suggesting its good to make learning harder, because sports kids and parents dont want to bother with any effort.

Why not make the volunteers (athletes) put the extra work in, rather than everyone?

I also did sports, but it's absurd to suggest those are a valid reason to disadvantage 95% of the student body

3

thesilversverker t1_ja81rdz wrote

> My mortgage was $1500 a month

I agree with your overall point, this number suggests you found a house extremely cheap. Even with PMI, it's something like a 180k house with good credit. Renting or buying, you're paying 2k-2500 for housing if you are a household of 3.

$400 for food a month is doable, but tight. 3 years ago, it would have been luxurious. Say goodbye to fresh fruits for the kids!

Utilities will average out around $6-800 a month for that household.

Transport with a paid off car will be $3-400 a month as well - to get that low $2k housing you will be doing significantly more travel.

So of your $1700, we ate $1200 to simply not freeze, and travel to/from work.

Now add in: professional development/education costs, home maintenance (2-4k/year), any pets, any medical costs (your costs indicated a low-premium plan), haircuts & clothing...

Can it be done? Totally.

But people like mr "need 150k" arent wrong that to do it requires sacrifice. A $100k family in 2005 would get to take vacations, go skiing, go to camp in the summer - not so much now.

1

thesilversverker t1_j1eqovn wrote

Yea - Im wondering why their supply rate is so low ($.06/kwH) - it looks like all the small orgs that negotiate their own supply pay half as much as CMP & Versa - and it's the state that sets their supply rate. Maybe the utility-owned interest in the solar farm?

If CMP could buy power that cheap, it would be $.16 vs $.13 per kwH, still better but much closer.

11