throwawaffleaway
throwawaffleaway t1_j1mqdf9 wrote
I tend to be seasonal. More fantasy and YA in winter when my brain is sad and I need an escape. More nonfic in summer when I’m active and interested in learning about subjects related to my activities (I love to hike so primarily nature books and memoirs). Though I do have a tendency to get into British and Viking history in early winter too.
throwawaffleaway t1_j0u9jpx wrote
I’m in university, and luckily my professors love when I cite relevant ideas from books I’ve read (fic and nonfic). Wrote a paper on surveillance— The Circle by Dave Eggers. Wrote a paper on predicting the future using the past— The Good Earth by Pearl S Buck. Wrote a paper on GPS data— On Trails by Robert Moor. Wrote a paper on double binds (specifically for women)— Jane Eyre.
I’m specifically trying to get a literature oriented career, and my professors know this. So possibly I’m just lucky. Also ofc these are not my only sources, just adding these in to illustrate the broader ideas better.
throwawaffleaway t1_iyp4qgp wrote
I want that umbrella to be my trophy wife. How did you get something so mundane to look so stunning???
throwawaffleaway t1_iy9r1ut wrote
I loved this book because of WHEN I read it. Looking back I can see how it doesn’t really reflect my tastes. It’s extremely “tell, don’t show” in my opinion, and if you’re as low as Nora you might need something like that. I don’t necessarily think this is Haig’s intention, I’ve read some of his other stuff and don’t find him particularly genius, but it’s good that it’s worked for some people. I really liked one of the later “lives” Nora fell into and what she does with it in her “real life” at the end. If you’re a fast reader who can handle being a bit noncommittal from the story, I’d encourage you to finish it for that, but if you prefer to be drawn deeply in, I don’t think it would be worth it for you then.
throwawaffleaway t1_ixx1nx2 wrote
Reply to Convenient Store Woman by Sayaka Murata by NotBorris
I think a huge detail in the book that’s easy to lose is the MC’s childhood behavior. Those events are described so quickly at the very beginning (I finished the whole book in like 3-4 hours) that I closed it and remembered “ohhh yeah… that’s what the context is for her needing a place so badly…” it is extremely eerie, even if that WASN’T part of her backstory
throwawaffleaway OP t1_ix1eox6 wrote
Reply to comment by Brizoot in How many different perspectives is too many? by throwawaffleaway
Oh, look into it if you like, but it’s not fantasy. It’s a “portrait of a marriage”, more like a portrait of everyone and their third cousin lol.
Yeah, I feel like multiple POV is standard in epics for a reason, and lots of fantasy/sci-fi have complex worlds that need to be explained to the reader. Providing multiple POV probably helps grasp that better, with everyone taking part in some event and the setting being perceived according to that event and the characters role.
I’m thinking for literary fiction, such as this, it’s not working very well depending on how long the masthead is and how relevant each person actually is to the story.
Thanks for getting in the weeds with me!
throwawaffleaway OP t1_ix1e66t wrote
Reply to comment by jefrye in How many different perspectives is too many? by throwawaffleaway
STOP ONE OF THE CHAPTERS IS CALLED “enough blue to make” HOW DID YOU KNOW 😂
throwawaffleaway OP t1_ix1cxgi wrote
Reply to comment by Brizoot in How many different perspectives is too many? by throwawaffleaway
Jeez that’s got to be some kind of record. How well did it work in that series? Did my chicken-or-egg reaction cross your mind? Would fewer perspectives have diminished the series in your opinion?
throwawaffleaway OP t1_ix1b0fh wrote
Reply to comment by Motoreducteur in How many different perspectives is too many? by throwawaffleaway
I have only read the first GOT book, but I watched the show and at least the perspective changing there MOSTLY contributed to the audience understanding how the fight for the throne unfolded throughout the whole country. Being such a long series and having complex political families, even if it’s tiresome, most of it makes sense. However, this is why I don’t read a lot of fantasy, because it IS a lot to keep track of.
I have encountered the bystander perspective before and done right, it can reveal so much. It’s sort of like breaking the fourth wall, reminding the audience that there’s so many other lives being lived besides the ones you’re reading about.
I like the rule of odds quite a bit. 1,3, or 5 seems like a decent amount of POV. The only book I can think of off the top of my head that had 2 perspectives (unless you count the very beginning before MC Lotto was born) was Fates and Furies, which I hated tbh.
Submitted by throwawaffleaway t3_yzoywe in books
throwawaffleaway t1_iuac9fr wrote
This is the third skull/skeleton post I’ve seen in the last 5 minutes on my home feed and I approve, keep ‘em coming. Put those bones on everything!!!!!
throwawaffleaway t1_iu415mr wrote
Reply to Portrait, me, pencil/ink, 2022 by glorycat
This looks like Taylor Swift if Tim Burton animated her
throwawaffleaway t1_j1mqycc wrote
Reply to comment by Mata_www in I fell in love and my interests in books changed drastically. by kingkontroverseP0si
In Cold Blood by Truman Capote is essential though it’s more of a massacre