titanofmeme
titanofmeme t1_jdyuhjo wrote
Reply to comment by Postnificent in Why don’t we use Venus as a dumpster? by Postnificent
Yes it absolutely does. Planets of the solar system are the finest specimens in current astronomy due to their accessibility. As soon as they are contaminated, the specimen is compromised.
titanofmeme t1_jdyu3ud wrote
Reply to comment by Postnificent in Why don’t we use Venus as a dumpster? by Postnificent
So let me get this straight: we produce an extraordinary amount of spacecraft with nuclear thermal propulsion, launch them into LEO using chemical rockets, capture orbital debris and then send both the engines and debris to venus, costing a conservative estimate of tens of millions per launch?
titanofmeme t1_jdyqbj4 wrote
Reply to comment by wicklowdave in Why don’t we use Venus as a dumpster? by Postnificent
Idk what tech we're talking about.
titanofmeme t1_jdy5cwt wrote
Reply to comment by Postnificent in Why don’t we use Venus as a dumpster? by Postnificent
Don't need to be, just physics. We need to be able to get the nuke engines into space. The only launch vehicles available are chemical rockets.
titanofmeme t1_jdy4nfe wrote
Reply to comment by Postnificent in Why don’t we use Venus as a dumpster? by Postnificent
And how do we get those into space?
titanofmeme t1_jdy4dbf wrote
Reply to comment by Postnificent in Why don’t we use Venus as a dumpster? by Postnificent
So what's your alternative?
titanofmeme t1_jdy3aba wrote
Reply to Why don’t we use Venus as a dumpster? by Postnificent
Probably been said, but the significant delta-v required to take an object from low earth orbit and place it on a trajectory to intercept venus makes this impractical. It would require an ungodly amount of energy.
titanofmeme t1_jdyumit wrote
Reply to comment by Postnificent in Why don’t we use Venus as a dumpster? by Postnificent
No, you aren't. Many people have had the idea. We're just saying how this one in particular won't work. No need to be antagonistic.