tivotox
tivotox t1_iuybact wrote
Reply to comment by cma_4204 in What to tell about a model you make deeper and deeper, doesn't make better results but doesn't overfit as well? by [deleted]
But DO will prevent overfitting, I don't have any overfitting it's not the relevant tool
tivotox t1_iuyb2oh wrote
Reply to comment by suflaj in What to tell about a model you make deeper and deeper, doesn't make better results but doesn't overfit as well? by [deleted]
The split has been done such as the train and test are highly different. the loss are almost equal on both datasets.
tivotox t1_iuyavzv wrote
Reply to comment by cma_4204 in What to tell about a model you make deeper and deeper, doesn't make better results but doesn't overfit as well? by [deleted]
The model is equivariant no dataset augmentation, no DO as well. The model doesn't overfit as I said
tivotox t1_iuy798z wrote
Reply to comment by suflaj in What to tell about a model you make deeper and deeper, doesn't make better results but doesn't overfit as well? by [deleted]
The loss here is for a denoiser, it can be seen as the variance between the noise and the noise predicted. So it's in this case a good metric
tivotox t1_iuyfoup wrote
Reply to comment by cma_4204 in What to tell about a model you make deeper and deeper, doesn't make better results but doesn't overfit as well? by [deleted]
I mean the dataset is extremely diverse. like millions clusters and every entry is noised when loaded on GPUs