tryin2staysane
tryin2staysane t1_is8bhom wrote
Reply to comment by WookieeSteakIsChewie in The Vulnerability of John Fetterman - Inside this year’s highest-stakes Senate race. by -TheFarce-
Any? One constitutionally required parts of his job is being on the Board of Pardons. He has a 100% attendance rate there. There ya go, evidence he did his job. Guess you'll admit you were wrong now.
tryin2staysane t1_is80h4n wrote
Reply to comment by WookieeSteakIsChewie in The Vulnerability of John Fetterman - Inside this year’s highest-stakes Senate race. by -TheFarce-
Because I'm hearing from you that evidence won't matter. I ask how much you need and you refuse to answer. Obviously that means you will refuse to hear anything against your narrative.
tryin2staysane t1_is7yyaa wrote
Reply to comment by WookieeSteakIsChewie in The Vulnerability of John Fetterman - Inside this year’s highest-stakes Senate race. by -TheFarce-
What a surprise, you're choosing what to hear and ignoring evidence to the contrary. There's no amount of evidence you'll accept to change your mind is what I'm hearing.
tryin2staysane t1_is7w7sn wrote
Reply to comment by WookieeSteakIsChewie in The Vulnerability of John Fetterman - Inside this year’s highest-stakes Senate race. by -TheFarce-
I'm asking how much evidence I need to provide. There's no point providing evidence if you're going to say it's not enough.
tryin2staysane t1_is7qagl wrote
Reply to comment by WookieeSteakIsChewie in The Vulnerability of John Fetterman - Inside this year’s highest-stakes Senate race. by -TheFarce-
How much evidence would need to be shown in order for you to find it inaccurate?
tryin2staysane t1_is7pc9p wrote
Reply to comment by WookieeSteakIsChewie in The Vulnerability of John Fetterman - Inside this year’s highest-stakes Senate race. by -TheFarce-
That didn't answer my question even a little bit.
How much would someone need to show that he did in order for you to admit that is inaccurate?
tryin2staysane t1_is7olkd wrote
Reply to comment by WookieeSteakIsChewie in The Vulnerability of John Fetterman - Inside this year’s highest-stakes Senate race. by -TheFarce-
How do you mean he never did anything? How much would someone need to show that he did in order for you to admit that isn't accurate?
tryin2staysane t1_is7dz5w wrote
Reply to comment by WookieeSteakIsChewie in The Vulnerability of John Fetterman - Inside this year’s highest-stakes Senate race. by -TheFarce-
>I'm very unimpressed by his time as Lt Governor
Why's that?
tryin2staysane t1_is799ta wrote
Reply to comment by WookieeSteakIsChewie in The Vulnerability of John Fetterman - Inside this year’s highest-stakes Senate race. by -TheFarce-
What are you basing that on, other than propaganda?
tryin2staysane t1_is78cog wrote
Reply to comment by WookieeSteakIsChewie in The Vulnerability of John Fetterman - Inside this year’s highest-stakes Senate race. by -TheFarce-
So why bother voting for Senate? Clearly you don't think they do anything.
tryin2staysane t1_is632c5 wrote
Reply to comment by WookieeSteakIsChewie in The Vulnerability of John Fetterman - Inside this year’s highest-stakes Senate race. by -TheFarce-
>Because in all his ads, he mentions none of that stuff. Just tattoos and "I'm tougher than Oz."
He's trying to win an election. Policies don't win elections. Hillary had policies coming out of her ass and Trump had insults. Warren had a plan for everything, Biden had a "I'll beat Trump".
tryin2staysane t1_is60chl wrote
Reply to comment by WookieeSteakIsChewie in The Vulnerability of John Fetterman - Inside this year’s highest-stakes Senate race. by -TheFarce-
By introducing or supporting bills in the Senate. Do you know what a Senator is?
tryin2staysane t1_is458p0 wrote
Reply to comment by WookieeSteakIsChewie in The Vulnerability of John Fetterman - Inside this year’s highest-stakes Senate race. by -TheFarce-
Universal pre-k and Childcare
Increase investments in career and technical programs
Community College tuition free
Improve the quality of care at the VA
Right to repair
Women's rights
Universal Healthcare
Ending conversion therapy
Strengthening LGBTQIA+ rights
Expanding workers rights
tryin2staysane t1_is1c2m8 wrote
Reply to comment by WookieeSteakIsChewie in The Vulnerability of John Fetterman - Inside this year’s highest-stakes Senate race. by -TheFarce-
>"Being Progressive" isn't a stance. I've yet to hear him talk about what he stands for outside of legal weed.
So you're just not listening to him?
tryin2staysane t1_is8vwj7 wrote
Reply to comment by WookieeSteakIsChewie in The Vulnerability of John Fetterman - Inside this year’s highest-stakes Senate race. by -TheFarce-
So again I'll ask, what does need to be shown for you to admit your assertion is inaccurate? You asked for one thing, I gave the lowest possible bit of evidence. Tell me what it would take. Or be honest with both of us and admit you don't care if there is evidence to show its inaccurate. You don't like Fetterman because of his policies, and you'll vote for him because he's not Oz. You don't want to be shown that your assumption is wrong because you don't want to have to find an honest reason to dislike him.