versaceblues

versaceblues t1_j0aa5n2 wrote

It seems like every argument against it is.

“Oh but it’s just doing statistical filtertring of patterns it’s been trained on. Which is different from the human brain”

But with no clear explanation of how the human brain is different, aside from “oh it’s more complex and does other things that humans do”

6

versaceblues OP t1_izdgolk wrote

>Is it worth even reading old papers? These are meant to communicate with researchers at the time the paper was published so its probably more efficient to learn these concepts and techniques from AI textbooks and blogs

Im just interested from a historical perspective.

1