xantxant
xantxant t1_ix5u3rw wrote
Reply to Jack Daniel’s asks Supreme Court to hear dog toy dispute. Will they bite? by WREGnewschannel3
- It's parody.
- The products are not confusingly-similar; they are not even the same product. One is alcohol, the other is a dog toy.
There is no trademark case here. They're out of their gourds. That doesn't mean this braindead court won't hear it, though.
> “To be sure, everyone likes a good joke. But VIP’s profit-motivated ‘joke’ confuses consumers by taking advantage of Jack Daniel’s hard-earned goodwill,” she wrote for the Louisville, Kentucky-based Brown-Forman Corp., Jack Daniel’s parent company.
No it doesn't. Shut up.
xantxant t1_iy2jhlx wrote
Reply to comment by niftyifty in Took me 37 years, but I did it. by johnbell
Yeah I just thought--wait, now that you've done this, how are you going to get the cheese packet out of there?
This explains everything.