Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Dyspaereunia t1_iy3ei4a wrote

Took me a bit to figure out that was a big toe.

373

Marilyn1512 t1_iy3hcgi wrote

I love the atmosphere in this one. The light is very pretty!

212

Floater1157 t1_iy3je4f wrote

Nice work dude. I wish I could create the human form this well.

14

Vacuum-energy t1_iy3m4ns wrote

What’s the disc thing around her head?

Looks beautiful by the way!

24

infinitemortis t1_iy3mowz wrote

3D? How? Do you have any good tutorials for that level of madtery?

9

losbadhombres OP t1_iy3n2cl wrote

Replying to RoughBeardBlaine (#732,140)

I don’t use Blender. I use DAZ studio for the model and pose, then I drag it into Cinema 4D for scene building and finish with Octane Render for the materials and lighting (which takes the majority of time).

15

cia_nagger229 t1_iy3r00k wrote

it looks like a painting. would be trippy if suddenly the perspective shifted a little

2

pinkpitbull t1_iy3rnq8 wrote

These are so renaissance like! Do you draw from models?

51

losbadhombres OP t1_iy3sbbd wrote

Replying to pinkpitbull (#733,305)

These are 3D, so there's no drawing per se. I may sketch out a pose idea that I'm working through, but typically I create 3D models using some references, but as for posing them, that can happen a number of ways like an original idea or emulating another artists model pose. You could say that a 3D model acts like a real model because you can pose them and keep tweaking their position until you get exactly what you want.

56

nippleduster7 t1_iy40ogw wrote

Absolutely amazing. I can’t stop looking at this.

3

420blazeit960 t1_iy4dj66 wrote

First glance I thought that was a penis lmaoo but beautiful😍❤

8

fudog1138 t1_iy4ggqh wrote

Replying to losbadhombres (#731,439)

I've not taken pictures with any sincerity in 35+ years. I'd like to get back into photography. Thinking of trying humans this time around Sorry for the simple question. How did you use fog in this shot?
I don't see any fog or distortion on the model. Is that a filter after the shit was taken? Sorry 😐. Thanks for your time, nice work.

6

TheBman26 t1_iy4mdtr wrote

Love it. Does 3D mean it's a 3D model? Just curious. Love the work though.

2

losbadhombres OP t1_iy4u0sn wrote

Replying to fudog1138 (#737,880)

It's all in Cinema 4D and the whole thing is 3D—no photography. The fog volume is just a giant cube of fog in the background with more density and another one with much lower fog density in the foreground.

Also I have two lights: one is a daylight simulator right at sunrise which is allowing the BG fog to glow, and the other one is a giant softbox that is working as my key light. Has a pretty low Kelvin.

23

whitehawk295 t1_iy5dbtb wrote

I straight up did not think that was her foot 🤣

1

Behind_You_Sir t1_iy5f9sg wrote

Do you model anything else besides naked women in your spare time? Fucking Christ. Get blocked.

−8

cipri_tom t1_iy5fd5w wrote

Newb question: if it's 3D, does it mean you can turn the camera to another angle?

It's interesting that you chose this angle, not a cm more to the right or left.

5

losbadhombres OP t1_iy5fyr8 wrote

Replying to cipri_tom (#744,625)

Yes I can move the camera all around. I chose this exact spot because the curve of back and side of face was at the angles I wanted. A little bit to the left or right quickly changes the leading lines and how the light plays off them.

5

DEATHbyBOOGABOOGA t1_iy5icdq wrote

Replying to NiNj4_C0W5L4Pr (#734,338)

It was all that Dan Marino's fault. Everybody knows that. If he had held the ball laces out like he was supposed to Ray never would have missed that kick. Dan Marino should die of gonorrhea and rot in hell.

7

newaccount47 t1_iy5msy8 wrote

I kinda feel like the muscles on her back and neck would be different with the way that her head is turned and the way her weight is distributed.

4

Strong_Grape31 t1_iy5na1x wrote

Wow another random naked woman. Groundbreaking stuff here. Really pushing the bounds of artistic expression.

2

vel_anandh t1_iy5nhcz wrote

This is amazing work in 3D!

And it just feels like a painting.

1

MazenAyman t1_iy5ojzr wrote

imagine spending time in this beautiful mesmerizing painting only for some degenerate redditor to use it as jack off material, because i know for a fact some sick fuck out there did it

4

danidr t1_iy5q8w4 wrote

Replying to Strong_Grape31 (#746,188)

Where did I compare this to Botticelli? All I’m saying is that he drew naked women too. OP was cricitizing based on that, not on the artistic merit. So, YOU get out too :)

5

tails_fly_weee t1_iy5uj0j wrote

Its veey hight quality just, i dont get it, in sich a moment, a sex one, i mean (u can see the d***) Why she has the (ring on head, i forgot how to say it in english). Bevause sex is one if the sins, unless after marry

−7

jericho t1_iy5uzfi wrote

Is this sub getting bombed by religious nutjobs?

It seems every picture with some skin gets several weird comments.

3

danidr t1_iy5wfm5 wrote

Replying to Ockwords (#747,845)

Define drawing then.

According to Cambridge Dictionary, it’s “to make a picture of something or someone with a pencil or pen”. Therefore, an oil painting is technically not drawn.

Or you could use the loose meaning of creating the representation of something on a 2D plane; and in that case, he DID draw. According to his description (and having worked with 3D renderings myself), it is a lengthy and creative process.

If you’re an artist, I hope you didn’t comment “OP didn’t draw this” in a derogatory way, because it would show little respect for the creative work of another human being.

If that was not your intention though, all good :)

0

Ockwords t1_iy5xevl wrote

Replying to danidr (#747,967)

> Define drawing then.

Sure. Drawing: Not a render.

Done.

> Therefore, an oil painting is technically not drawn.

Correct, we call those paintings lol

> Or you could use the loose meaning of creating the representation of something on a 2D plane

Taking a photo is also not drawing.

> If you’re an artist, I hope you didn’t comment “OP didn’t draw this” in a derogatory way, because it would show little respect for the creative work of another human being.

Just because they're an artist doesn't mean I have to respect their work. I didn't say he wasn't an artist, I just said it wasn't a drawing, it's a render. It's a completely different process.

−2

sharksnut t1_iy5xy8l wrote

What a lovely back, all the way down.

The female back is so underappreciated in pop culture

4

briareus08 t1_iy60wjl wrote

Impressive work! This is like a renaissance painting.

3

badpeaches t1_iy62apd wrote

I can't wait till you learn how to paint clothing on women.

23

criscrunk t1_iy62iqg wrote

Biblically accurate cheeks.

0

dansker333999 t1_iy64k4d wrote

Absolutely fucking gorgeous! 🔥🌹

Amazing job ❤️

3

Bendinggrass t1_iy67tcf wrote

Thank you so much.

This is very beautiful.

You mentioned the programs you use... why would you use Daz Studio, or Cinema 4D(?) or one over another. I would really appreciate you musing over that for us. Where can I find more of your images-artwork?

2

DunebillyDave t1_iy6hzu9 wrote

What is the subject? There's a beautiful naked woman with a saintly halo around her head. What's the context?

1

TrouserSnake88 t1_iy6u65q wrote

I had to zoom in to figure out that that was actually her foot/toe…

1

SaintNord t1_iy6x1j6 wrote

Is the women depicted the same as in “La Venere Seduta”?

1

Tegdag t1_iy760m7 wrote

I love how you added the jewelry. Such a wonderful small detail.

1

QuantumRobot_9000 t1_iy763q0 wrote

I did not think that was a toe at first. Did a double take.

1

r4plez t1_iy78fow wrote

She should be dead already, No1 can bend neck that hard

0

ReiTomen t1_iy7tngr wrote

Woman be holding up too much cake

1