Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Whoa1Whoa1 t1_j1eks4h wrote

Reply to comment by kanible in Rosetta, Me, Digital, 2022 by noahbradley

Anyone can critique art.

Also, it's cartoony because the dimensions are wonky.

  1. Her eyes are about twice as big as they should be, leading to the face looking very Disney/Pixar animated and cartoony.
  2. Her thigh width is literally thicker than any part of her waist or torso. That is impossible and no human has a thigh that has a larger circumference than their torso.
  3. Her leg length should be half or less than half of her total height. Here it is clearly way more than that, which leads to a really strange look especially with the thigh width wider than the entire torso.
14

user74211 t1_j1etnk8 wrote

I don't know if you noticed, but both of her upper legs are pushed against something (the chair and her foot), and because of that I am very sure that this is not an unreachable physique. I have a similar build, with maybe slightly broader shoulders, but the waist to legs seems relatively normal when you also consider the arm that blocks part of the waist (which means that it's not as small as it might look at first glance) as well as the slight twist of the torso

−4