Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Apart-Window-1792 t1_iyf504i wrote

I don’t care. I’m just tired of hearing people talk about it like it’s a matter of life or death.

−3

The_BrainDancer t1_iyf51bu wrote

if we can hump dead animals and antelopes Then there's no reason that a man and another man can't elope

4

Cornbreaker t1_iyf51pm wrote

I don't care, it's not my business

3

The_Paradoxigm t1_iyf5330 wrote

Same as non same sex marriage.

Do what you want.

2

[deleted] t1_iyf53sz wrote

Honestly it’s fine by me. If they are happy together I’m happy for them. I don’t see why they shouldn’t be allowed to be together and even get married :)

2

jumboss33 t1_iyf5521 wrote

Sure.. why shouldn't they be misserable just like the rest of us

1

FoxxyFredd t1_iyf5c0m wrote

Who people marry is none of my business. As long as you love each other and you’re not marrying a child my opinion should make no difference. Love is love.

10

unicorn-semen t1_iyf5esf wrote

If two consenting adults love each other and want to get married, more power to them.

2

Anti-Climacdik t1_iyf5fn1 wrote

More acceptable than limpwristed pseudo-controversial karmabait textposting

2

stinkapottamus t1_iyf5rgr wrote

I hate controversial topics but for some reason I feel like responding to this. Without getting political, because my views fall on both sides, as I believe most do, I can’t imagine why anyone would care who someone marries. I now pronounce you Chuck and Larry was a funny movie about 2 friends who got married for health insurance reasons (I think). I often hear things like this as an argument for how the world will be exploited by same sex marriages. I’m a mid 30s business owner married for 7 years. I’m in love with my wife, but the reason we got married 7 years ago was because I had a health issue that was going to be expensive without health insurance, so we got married and I got immediately added to her policy. So a 50k problem cost me $500. So why is it different for someone who is gay.

4

takethelastexit t1_iyf5u73 wrote

Cool? I don’t really care about marriage in general but if it makes people happy that’s great for them

1

Objective_Stick8335 t1_iyf5w11 wrote

Don't care for the terminology but can't summon the energy to actually complain.

1

JSmith666 t1_iyf5xvc wrote

Its not for me but let other people make their own choices. They just have to accept not everybody will like that choice.

1

NashvilleDave2021 t1_iyf5y8l wrote

Not my business and it creeps me out that people and governments think that it is theirs.

3

sarmstrong1961 t1_iyf5zdt wrote

I know it's not a popular opinion but I really, deep down, don't think that anyone should get married. Statistics show that the only thing that can truly prevent divorce is never getting married in the first place.

0

oceansblue1984 t1_iyf66m8 wrote

I don't care. It doesn't impact my life in a negative way . People get one life to live, if they aren't hurting anyone then let people live their lives. Why are people insistent on making other people's life's miserable just because they want to be happy in their lives.

1

Apart-Window-1792 t1_iyf6lbk wrote

Replying to mywifeisamilf420 (#833,384)

I mean homosexuality could be. But same sex marriage itself isn’t. Like if homosexuality is legal but marriage isn’t, you aren’t going to die. You can still be with your partner for life. A marriage certificate is just paper.

−2

ATD1981 t1_iyf6xcg wrote

God created adam and eve not adam and steve!

I dont know why anyone would be at all negatively concerned with same sex marriage

1

Account-by-force t1_iyf867q wrote

I think that people can marry whoever they want. And if anybody got a problem with it, that’s their problem and nothing else.

1

FoxxyFredd t1_iyf8a2h wrote

Replying to Apart-Window-1792 (#834,415)

Many people are killed each year simply for loving someone of the same gender. No, they do not simply “fall over dead”. Even being accused of homosexuality can lead to torture in some places.

1

[deleted] t1_iyf8yad wrote

Everyone should be allowed to be miserable

1

Awesomejuggler20 t1_iyf8zum wrote

Why would I have a problem with it? If the couple is happy, then good for them and I wish them the best together. If they’re happy, that’s all that matters. Nothing wrong with it.

1

chunwookie t1_iyf9bgf wrote

Replying to [deleted] (#834,574)

You are acting like the only benefit of marriage is tax related. There are a host of other factors that are important too. Inheriting property, medical and legal decision making, among others. Preventing a couple who are committed to each other from marrying simply because they can't have children needlessly complicates their lives. It also ignores the possibility that the two could choose to adopt children after marriage.

3

DeerTrivia t1_iyf9rqa wrote

I'm embarrassed that it's even still an issue. They should be legal.

1

Display250 t1_iyfacxi wrote

That people who ask these kind of questions probably have a mental incapacitation

1

DeerTrivia t1_iyfb2ev wrote

Replying to [deleted] (#835,347)

Since when is the goal of human society to produce a flourishing human population? We're already well on our way to being overpopulated, and I'd argue there's a pretty large chunk of people who aren't flourishing right now. If anything, letting LGBTQ+ adopt children would do more for modeling and promoting a stable family unit than leaving those kids in foster care.

1

Emperor_Cartagia t1_iyfc5ig wrote

I think they're marriages and they're none of my business.

1

AliJoof t1_iyfcbaf wrote

One of the gayest things you can do, imho.

1

DeerTrivia t1_iyfckwz wrote

Replying to [deleted] (#836,416)

> I’m not sure I agree. I don’t know what kind of outcomes we can expect from letting same sex couples raise children and I’m not in favor of experimenting on kids to find out.

Good thing those experiments have already been done, and found no difference in outcomes.

> I’d say the goal of every organism is to flourish so I guess that’s been our goals since forever.

Clearly not, when huge societies like China tightly control population growth.

"Humanity" has no goal. You could say as a species we have an evolutionary drive to propogate, but we ignore or overcome our evolutionary limitations all the time. And more importantly, not every member of that species feels that need to propogate. Homosexuality occurs in many different species. So why should they be held to an evolutionary standard that doesn't apply to them?

1

Tistoer t1_iyfcs5l wrote

Replying to [deleted] (#836,570)

At least 90% of worldwide problems are caused by overpopulation. There were 2,6 billion people in 1950, 70 years later it's 8 billion. With this growth we simply cannot survive.

If two happy men or women decide to love eachother and not have a baby, it's only better for the world.

1

MisstressMary t1_iyfd7c5 wrote

I don't mind it, as long as the couple end up being happy with each other

1

papaHans t1_iyfdy4g wrote

Now of my business who you marry as long it's at age of consent.

1