Submitted by otter_spud t3_ye2buh in Connecticut
ertebolle t1_ity5sgb wrote
Reply to comment by Whaddaulookinat in How can we incentivize real discussions around solutions to home affordability in CT? by otter_spud
It’s not about feefees, it’s just that antiracism isn’t a project they’re particularly invested in (or feel any sense of obligation to assist with). The tax / cultural benefits to adding new residents are a much better carrot than earning KendiBucks.
Whaddaulookinat t1_itybe0f wrote
But not calling out clear dog whistles isn't a viable strategy either, nor is ignoring the clear economic and cultural alliances that can be formed at the state and federal level. The "selfish" case has been made: density helps property value and increases economic vitality, asymmetry issues over changes of taste, etc...
Those that are really against change are against it because they feel demographic threat. Most people are in favor of moderate change in zoning restrictions, those that are opposed should be called out to defend their positions
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments