psu1989 t1_iwzm4le wrote
Reply to comment by mynameisnotshamus in Saturday Morning email from State rep Harry Arora about increases in electricity and natural gas prices by mynameisnotshamus
The real question is why is our power coming from fossil fuels? Why is the nuke plant not running a full capacity? Follow the money.
Synapse82 t1_iwzp4q1 wrote
> The real question is why is our power coming from fossil fuels? Why is the nuke plant not running a full capacity? Follow the money.
Pretty much it right here, clean efficient energy source we keep trying to shut down.
uterinejellyfish t1_ix008mh wrote
Nuclear, solar, wind, etc. All seem to be ignored in the US in general. I don't get it but it seems to be people against it just because it's green and they want to keep burning oil for no good reason.
Synapse82 t1_ix00tam wrote
Unfortunately, it’s the same wind\solar green industry that tries to squash nuclear. Because it isn’t a money maker. So its really an overall poor situation for such a powerful source of energy.
uterinejellyfish t1_ix01amn wrote
It's also unfortunate that we have private energy in the US. If it was state owned and only made enough money to keep it running and a little on top for expansion it would be a lot cheaper because decisions would be made based on what's best for the population
chair_caner t1_ix0xxd7 wrote
Exactly. Follow the money. But it's simpler than you think.
Power costs a certain amount per megawatt, depending on the source. Until recently, natural gas has been the cheapest source. The grid (ISONE) bids for the lowest cost to generate electricity in the day-ahead and real-time market. If it costs more to make the electricity than you earn, plants will not deliver to the grid. When demand, and therefore prices, rise, different fuels turn on to meet the demand. They won't run just because they feel like it. They need to cover their costs. Thank deregulation for that maneuver.
That's what killed coal and half of our nukes. Cheap gas. Also keep in mind that I can burn gas at my house at 80% or 95% efficiency (stove/furnace or condensing gas boiler). A power plant using gas is best case 50% efficient. So tell me how the pipeline wasn't a better environmental option.
Going green: Solar and wind rely on batteries to feed consistently to the grid. There are "virtual power plants" that use the solar batteries in your homes to deliver a controllable amount of power back to the grid, coordinated between the battery supplier (Tesla, etc) and ISO. It's a combination of residential and commercial projects that contribute. So do your part and get panels for your house.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments