Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

SweetMojaveRain t1_iyanoxx wrote

I hope whoever is housing this piece of filth is tempted by the cheddar, 25000 isnt bad

127

buried_lede t1_iyavram wrote

Is there a car he was driving that was described anywhere?

15

WhittlingDan t1_iyaxvat wrote

Replying to MondaleforPresident (#785,903)

I don't trust the state nor juries enough to not murder innocent people. We can let people out of prison, we can't take them back out of the hole in the ground.

I also oppose it on regular moral grounds as well. Once locked up a person is not a threat to society any longer so its clearly not about protecting society at that point.

I do hope they catch this guy soon.

40

WhittlingDan t1_iyayakc wrote

I hope this monster never sees the free world again.

48

ranfangirl t1_iyb3n5a wrote

I don't understand how he has not been captured yet? I can't see his family or friends giving him any help considering what he's accused of. I'd be afraid of him. Can we assume he's taken his own life if he hasn't been captured yet?

33

Majormoscow t1_iyb4w5h wrote

Replying to [deleted] (#785,037)

I don’t agree. I can feel this same vengefulness. but when I try to see where the righteousness to behold that vengeance would come from I can’t locate it. Murder of innocence, robbing of a young life is heinous, and lesser so there is wickedness in vengeance.

5

billybobwillyt t1_iyb6lqc wrote

Replying to Lopsided_Cupcake_988 (#788,285)

If there's even a chance an innocent person could be executed, there shouldn't be a death penalty. And if the number of people getting exonerated after years on death row isn't enough for you, try the people that have been exonerated after execution. It's even cheaper to just put them away forever, anyway.

12

Kraz_I t1_iyb7u8d wrote

Replying to ranfangirl (#787,817)

Possibly, but he also might have fled the state before prosecutors issued the warrant which would make it harder to find him. With modern facial recognition set up everywhere, it's harder to escape as a fugitive, but not impossible.

17

Lopsided_Cupcake_988 t1_iyb7vpg wrote

Replying to billybobwillyt (#788,579)

So if you keep them in prison aren’t they guilty? Or wouldn’t that highlight a flaw in the justice system that needs to be fixed so only guilty people are in prison because our rights say you are innocent until proven guilty. And also why would execution be more expensive than keeping them housing and feeding them for the rest of their life when an execution would put an end to that? It shows that there is a major problem with how executions are done.

−4

billybobwillyt t1_iyb9csr wrote

Replying to Lopsided_Cupcake_988 (#788,932)

Many innocent people have spent decades in prison. There are many, many flaws in our justice system. Execution is expensive, but where the money really flows is appeals, legal reviews, years on death row, etc. It's well established that an inmate on death row (on average) costs us far more than someone serving life in prison. The solution (which is really not a solution) would be to immediately execute anyone convicted and condemned to death. That would reduce costs and also drive the number of innocent people murdered by the state up. Not a great option.

https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/capital-punishment-or-life-imprisonment-some-cost-considerations

https://www.leg.state.nv.us/App/NELIS/REL/76th2011/ExhibitDocument/OpenExhibitDocument?exhibitId=17686&fileDownloadName=h041211ab501_pescetta.pdf

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/urls_cited/ot2016/16-5247/16-5247-2.pdf

https://www.hg.org/legal-articles/which-is-cheaper-execution-or-life-in-prison-without-parole-31614

8

B6304T4 t1_iyb9rx1 wrote

$25k dead or alive?

30

Lopsided_Cupcake_988 t1_iybbfqa wrote

Replying to billybobwillyt (#789,371)

What you’re saying is there is no way to execute guilty people with out executing innocent people? Like only having it for mass shooters and people that are open about it and admit guilt isn’t possible or able to be done cheaper than letting them live

0

BoofTheShroom t1_iybbnv9 wrote

indeed hes a clown, that tattoo represents him well. this shit head wont hide for long

12

Mmmslash t1_iybdrne wrote

Replying to Careless-Shoulder-12 (#788,949)

This guy is not going to go into general population. He's going to be locked down 23 hours a day, alone, and that other hour is going to be walking in circles in an enclosed courtyard under armed supervision.

Assuming, of course, he does not kill himself before then, or get killed by the police on apprehension.

4

locke0479 t1_iybgu41 wrote

Replying to Lopsided_Cupcake_988 (#789,989)

No, because as soon as you allow it for some people, it’s going to be allowed for others. Who gets to determine when someone is “100% guilty”? Lots of people that “confessed” turned out to be coerced confessions that were disproven by other evidence, but most would claim a confession is 100% guilt and thus okay to execute.

7

Sorry_Elevator7166 t1_iybj7k6 wrote

This piece of shit deserves the firing squad.

Or at least to be big bubbas new toy in prison

3

Lopsided_Cupcake_988 t1_iybog28 wrote

Replying to locke0479 (#791,541)

What if there is definitive evidence like in the case of a mass shooter even after admitting and being throughly scrutinized? should we let them continue to live off of our tax money. Why does it have to be allowed for others if it’s allowed in these cases?

3

locke0479 t1_iybp712 wrote

Replying to Lopsided_Cupcake_988 (#793,693)

Because that’s not how anything works. Why is “only in the very specific instance of a mass shooter who has been caught on the scene and has been verified via cameras to be the shooter” going to be the only possible execution crime? It wouldn’t. As soon as you allow one it’s “what about…” and “but also these guys…”. This conversation right now is about how it should come back for a guy who isn’t a mass shooter (and for the record, this guy is an enormous piece of human garbage and I hope he suffers horrifically the rest of his miserable life). So now we’ve gone from “ mass shooters with direct evidence” to “well, this guy really sucks though, amiright???”.

And come on with the taxpayer thing. Seriously be honest with yourself, no bullshit…do you think your taxes change even one penny if this guy spends the next 50 years in prison until he dies, or if he is executed or dies before? If he drops dead of a heart attack right now and never needs to be imprisoned, do you think you’re gonna get a rebate on your taxes? They’ll just spend that relatively small amount of money on something else. The prison already exists. The prison employees are hired and paid for regardless of whether there’s 8,000 prisoners in CT or 8,001. The “cost to house a prisoner” ignores that a lot of those costs are being paid no matter how many individuals are imprisoned.

6

locke0479 t1_iybpjij wrote

Replying to WhittlingDan (#786,302)

Yup, and there’s no indication that execution does anything as a deterrent (which logically makes sense if you stop to think about it for a second; crimes are nearly always committed either without thinking of the consequences or with an expectation that they’ll get away with it, particularly at the level you have to reach to even be considering execution).

At the end of the day it’s a revenge thing. And I get it, fuck this guy. But revenge isn’t good enough if even one innocent person has been executed. It’s not “execute or let them wander the streets”, it’s “execution or they’re locked up the rest of their lives”.

5

Lopsided_Cupcake_988 t1_iybr40k wrote

Replying to locke0479 (#793,903)

Why is it have to be “what about or but also these guys” some people don’t deserve to continue getting a chance to enjoy this life. There’s many other scenarios too where if it’s verified that the punishment should be given to them. If this person goes to jail he’ll be given opportunity to eat sleep interact potentially have fun and enjoy himself etc

3

Kraz_I t1_iybxtrq wrote

Replying to Paolo2ss (#793,619)

I'm just making assumptions here, but there are a lot of ways people can be tracked now the way technology is. Many many surveillance cameras are tracked through databases and can pick out peoples faces. Forensic scientists can even tell where and when you were somewhere in a sound recording by listening to the background noise from the electric grid.

9

WengFu t1_iyc7aet wrote

I can’t believe someone with a neck tattoo would ever do something bad.

−1

auntiemaury t1_iycdupe wrote

Replying to Prime_Cat_Memes (#785,447)

Jesus Christ that was an ordeal. I knew a mother of one of his victims, I stayed up all night to make sure he was actually dead. I worked in Jewett City at the time, noone gave a shit that I was dead on my feet all day

5

chickennugar t1_iycmm8z wrote

it's unsettling how whenever i see posters like this, the face on them looks oddly familiar

5

Shellsbells821 t1_iycnjpa wrote

Have you seen pictures of Camilla, his daughter? She was beautiful. How do you dismemberment your own child?

This person is 100% evil. How he was allowed out in mind baffling.

The man has no soul or heart.

14

TacoDaTugBoat t1_iycsbrz wrote

Replying to [deleted] (#793,555)

I agree with the other poster. You should delete this. Just a quick look through your post history revealed enough about you that your employer would be able to identify you.

3

h20berry t1_iycsju4 wrote

If he'd only murdered his daughter a year earlier it would have been perfectly legal and he'd be a hero to the left

−22

HaveYouSeenHerbivore t1_iycssgx wrote

Replying to Kraz_I (#796,079)

Someone watches too much CSI

Most of the cameras out there have a hard time seeing a face from further than 25-50ft and those are at 4k. Sure if you already know someone you might recognize them, but they’re generally not clear enough to be able to match any type of facial recognition.

It may happen eventually, but it’s certainly not happening on any massive scale just yet.

7

Cfest01 t1_iycwj9c wrote

Rumor is that he's out of CT and more than likely in NY area.

3

HighJeanette t1_iyd1m4l wrote

How the fuck can't the cops/fbi find this guy? Are they even trying?

4

coolducklingcool t1_iydi8bj wrote

Replying to HighJeanette (#806,966)

I’m sure he is far from CT at this point. In a country this populous, it’s not that hard. He definitely has help though - since he can’t use debit or credit cards and provably has to stay indoors as much as possible.

Hell, he could be in Mexico or Canada by now.

3

CiforDayZServer t1_iydtlg1 wrote

Replying to Fmy925 (#804,711)

I’m fairly sure that most AI facial tracking software deals with masks (medical) fairly easily, eye distance, placement, and body shape can easily be used. Keep in mind China is probably the most advanced and it’s beyond common for the majority of people to be wearing masks.

3

centmaineguy t1_iyet4z8 wrote

Find this piece of shit and hopefully some good Samaritan will take this bastard out first and he’ll never see a day in a quart room

1

Vergastein t1_iyfcokp wrote

If i go to the fbi and ask them to give me all the info and leads they have on him will they? So i can go find him

1