Spooky2000 t1_ix53mjf wrote
Reply to comment by _343_Guilty_Spark__ in Connecticut’s Blumenthal, other senators to FTC: Probe Twitter security, take needed action by jr_reddit
>I’m sure you will get very well thought out responses from both of them
They had legitimate reasons for those investigations. What reasons other than the fact that Musk bought Twitter do they have for investigating them now?
And what did any of those have to do with "swaying public opinion"?
_343_Guilty_Spark__ t1_ix549rb wrote
Try again without goalpost moving
dumbthrow33 t1_ix5e8vt wrote
It’s only moving the goal posts if it doesn’t line up with what you believe to be right. Got it 😉
_343_Guilty_Spark__ t1_ix8bgkk wrote
A much shorter admittance of being wrong, very good. Still 18 words too long but getting closer
Spooky2000 t1_ix58qr2 wrote
I did not move any goalposts. Read what I was responding to in the first place.
_343_Guilty_Spark__ t1_ix58urn wrote
“They sure didn't care before Musk bought it...”
Verbatim
Spooky2000 t1_ix59hrr wrote
Yup, in response to
>Twitter can be used to sway public opinion. That's why they care.
They didn't give a shit when Twitter was banning people for "wrongthink", or when it was taking "advice" from the White House on what information to ban.
_343_Guilty_Spark__ t1_ix8b7iv wrote
Very cool. You are saying all of this now, and did not, and were not, saying it earlier. That is goal post moving 101
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments