ChronWeasely t1_jeeuusp wrote
Can this be combined with something else to increase the total recovery? 70% in an efficient process is good, but losing 30% each cycle isn't. I'm assuming then a secondary processing with more energy intensive means will recover most of the remaining 30%, but costing approximately 70% less to process due to decreased volume?
findingmike t1_jefw04o wrote
Hopefully they can improve the process with some experimentation.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments