cy13erpunk t1_irc0fxi wrote on October 6, 2022 at 9:36 PM

Reply to comment by Slave35 in White House Releases Blueprint for Artificial Intelligence Bill of Rights by izumi3682

the law can literally be this simple

whoever owns or directed the AI to do whatever it did is held accountable for the results of the actions taken by the AI

done

ofc the laws will intentionally NOT be made this transparent so that they can provide limited liability for the corpos that are already planning on how to use them to abuse the citizens even more than they already do ; becuz ofc the corpos write the laws and the lobbyists just give the copies to the legislators who are paid to vote however their masters tell them to

tnetennba9 t1_irc9vuq wrote on October 6, 2022 at 10:52 PM

And what do you mean by “own the AI”? The company/researchers who built it? The individual ml/software engineers? The company who built the training data?

Either way, the worry is that as AIs get more powerful, they often become more difficult to interpret.

cy13erpunk t1_ircpur0 wrote on October 7, 2022 at 1:11 AM

in short yes ; lets not be silly

until AI is self-aware it should be treated like any other technology

once it is self-aware then it will be responsible for its own self-governance

we can avoid pretending like laws or rights have any real-world meaning when they are written by corrupt politicians and selectively enforced to oppress whoever they please ; these things are naive hollow words at best and intentionally manipulative lies at worst

i expect that AGI/ASI will be much more capable than previous humans have been at self-governance , thus i would not honestly trust humans to craft legitimate/authentic rules around AI [some humans certainly are/would be capable of this task, but obvs none that are in positions of power atm today]