Submitted by Stephen_P_Smith t3_y6ut1m in Futurology
Stephen_P_Smith OP t1_isrb098 wrote
Submission statement: I find the claim that AI can predict the future with 99% accuracy to be overly sensational, and in need of statistical benchmarking! But that is just my singular opinion, and I am wondering how other more sophisticated thinkers might react. Hence, this article was shared here. Cheers!
Phit_sost_3814 t1_isrc3n7 wrote
Then why post it?
[deleted] t1_isrfnr2 wrote
[deleted]
WatchingUShlick t1_isrd6w2 wrote
Maybe National Enquirer would be a better source.
[deleted] t1_isrc4bz wrote
I think that there is no information available but a claim. No link to the research, or even anything in the article backing that 99% number.
Astranoth t1_isrcylv wrote
Article is a mess. I can’t find any date stamps on when they tried this. Can’t find any details on how they got to 99%
Sensationalist click bait imo
PM_ur_Rump t1_isrcb0j wrote
I think it's the Sun.
ChronoPsyche t1_isrggbi wrote
No need for more sophisticated readers here. It's usually always safe to assume the Sun is a sensationalist pile of trash. Next time, see if you can find a more credible source reporting it first and then post it. If not, just leave it be. A lot of Redditors only look at the headline and will be misinformed by this.
LabyrinthConvention t1_isre34n wrote
As a thinker, it's 100% for sure.
VaultdBoy t1_isry4j3 wrote
https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.00881 I found this, with the percentage mentioned in the "AI based solutions" part So the pure ML results are pretty low compared to the 99% accuracy, which is achieved with mixed ML and Hand Crafted methods
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments