Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

ASK_IF_IM_PENGUIN t1_ithfro6 wrote

I'm not sure I understand.

People are moving away from China, but by doing so are allowing China to dominate the industry?

30

Allarius1 t1_ithhzzc wrote

I think it’s more like:

Huawei has superior technology and by not working with them, the software countries are using, is subpar in terms of security. (Based on the “racing ahead with 5G adoption” comment)

So by not allowing them to be a part of it, they have inadvertently made it easier for Chinese hackers to gain access more so than if they just integrated huawei to begin with.

5

thezoomies t1_itlmxx7 wrote

Nothing provided by a Chinese company is secure. This has more to do with data and IP sovereignty than it does with technological advancement.

2

lughnasadh OP t1_ithh5oc wrote

>>I'm not sure I understand.

A few different people comment in the OP article.

The TLDR version is that the companies that have switched from Huawei for 5G have chosen even less secure and easy to hack software.

−8

ArenSteele t1_ithpqjq wrote

Well it’s either Huawui hardware with built in back doors for Chinese state hackers to have guaranteed access or other hardware that might be less secure in general but lack the Chinese back door.

So they could actually be more secure from Chinese hacking but maybe less secure from random black hats?

18

ednksu t1_itigeyc wrote

I also took that anything with the legacy Chinese tech is going to have issues because it won't have servicing on the back end.

2