Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

kzeetay t1_iuqfatg wrote

Reply to comment by Rogaar in Launch of Aquila, the first neutral-atom quantum processor with up to 256 qubits. by steel_member

I’ll come back to this post to laugh at you once I buy my first quantum home computer that will probably be left abandoned in the living room and used sparingly by my son to print his homework.

98

flashingcurser t1_iurd4cv wrote

To be fair, there was a long gap between ENIAC and useful/inexpensive home computers. This, I think, is a similar jump in technology.

11

HerbHurtHoover t1_iuu9opv wrote

The point is that from the most basic standpoint, quantum computing isn't going to replace binary processors. It just does different things.

1

Komnos t1_iurkeep wrote

I'm not sure even a quantum computer can make printers work, thanks to Schrodinger's inkwell.

10

[deleted] t1_iuqof66 wrote

[deleted]

−10

itchyfrog t1_iuqqois wrote

"One day every major city in America will have a telephone"

Alexander Graham Bell.

12

MrPinguv t1_iuqqy5p wrote

I think it could be a possible case of a problem that didn’t happen yet so we don’t need a solution right now.

6

ISuckAtFunny t1_iuqunbt wrote

It’s called a joke. Do you even know what that is?

3

VertigoWalls t1_iuqwqpa wrote

You really missed the meaning on that one. You must be the life of the party.

2