I mean, you pretty much confirmed everything they said.

You don't actually live in the city, you take your opinions of the city mostly from clickbait headlines, and are so self righteous that you think your run of the mill ranting is "objective criticism".

Ive never read a comment that more clearly oozes "neckbeard".

No its not. Even the budget, edge of space options are far, far too resource intensive to ever be affordable.

The "but some people said cars wouldn't catch on" thing is a fallacy.

No. Theres a reason why 80 since the first rockets flew that they are still only launched by large organizations with large financial backing. The technology is just mot compatible with personal use. Rockets are never going to be safe enough or efficient enough that you can park one in your backyard and take a joyride to space.

The point is that from the most basic standpoint, quantum computing isn't going to replace binary processors. It just does different things.

Uh..... ok? We are talking about the meat industry.... why are you talking about landfills....

You are insane, you know that?

I also never said cows add new carbon to the world. I said that the cycle is not carbon neutral. There is a net addition of greenhouse gasses to the atmosphere.

Please, go get checked out. Im not replying to anymore of your batshit responses.

Oh.

My.

God.

If. You. Don't. Breed. The. Cows. That. Methane. Doesn't. Get. Produced.

Period.

There is no other matter that decays into methane.

Also "carbon conjured from nothing"???? What on earth are you talking about????

Like, seriously, what the fuck is wrong with you.

No..... it doesn't.....

The methane comes specifically from the manure made by the cows.

It doesn't just magically exist otherwise.

Its truly mind boggling you are still going. You're argument is that no matter what the same amount of methane is always going to be produced.

If you use, ie, plant based substitutes, then all that extra methane from the cows is gone. It doesn't magically happen elsewhere, it is a source that doesn't exist anymore.

How are you this dumb. You aren't using science you are making absolutely herculean acts of moon logic.

Holy shit.

My guy.

If you don't breed the cows they don't produce methane.

The two choices aren't in the atmosphere or in the cows.

The actual fuck is going on inside your brain.

The concentration of carbon also isn't the problem. The volume of greenhouse gasses is the problem. And methane is way worse than co2 as a greenhouse gas.

You are actually braindead..... you have no clue how any of this works and apparently think you do which is worrying....

My god.

Ok, i guess i have to spell it out for you:

The manure comes from the meat and dairy industry. Its not natural. Its industrial waste. We can eliminate that source. You have to pretend i..... think cows magically materialize matter.... because I already explained to you that carbon cycle isn't that simple and you can't wrap your head around that.

So, to sum up, you are unable to just admit that the methane comes from an unnecessary source that can be eliminated without burning more carbon, are doggedly insisting that its carbon neutral when its not, and seem to think your misunderstanding of the carbon cycle is a gotcha.

Dude, just give it up.

.... buddy.....

Why do you thunk there are so many cows....

You can't be that stupid.....

Holy shit.

Do you actually believe all that manure just naturally exists?

I swear, you are either stone cold stupid or avoiding the issue.

It. Does. Not. Exist. Anyways.

Its industrial byproduct.

How is that so hard for you to understand.

Quit repeating the same thing I answered already over and over again and actually engage with what I'm saying.

A) it doesn't exist anyways, we can independently end its production.

B) Methane is much worse than CO2 and you aren't shortcutting anything, you are letting the worse one into the atmosphere

C) ITS STILL NOT CARBON NEUTRAL WHY DO YOU KEEP SAYING THAT.

Biofuels are industry green washing. They don't solve the problem and make us continue to be reliant on their products.

But its not inevitable because the manure is from industry. And its still not carbon neutral.

This isn't really true. Even ignoring the supply chain footprint, its not carbon neutral. Methane is a massive polluter. Its very hard to contain and when it leaks its a more problematic greenhouse gas than Co2

Almost three decades on, and this is the first of its kind.

Renewable carbon fuels are a failure. They are not efficient and they are still massively polluting.

Lmao.

I didn't say its invalid because you quoted specs. I already said why its invalid, but you have to keep pretending I didn't to keep this going.

You are just straight up lying at this point.

Buh bye

I already did that part...... fucking reddit man. You are just dragging the conversation along for no reason. Not everything has to he a constant back and forth.

No, you just think quoting a spec sheet makes your argument valid..

Damn, man. You have no idea what you are saying, do you?

This quite the weird take.

Tell me, do you think the light ing cable wouldn't have this problem if it was actually a standard and not a patent locking tool?

The fact you have to keep claiming im relaying only my experiences, which i am not, says all anyone needs to know about you. Pathetic.

Jesus christ, give it a rest. You aren't fooling anyone. Its common knowledge that they fall apart. This weird gaslighting shtick is just sad.