Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Hades_adhbik t1_iusgapl wrote

>Interestingly enough, AlphaTensor is a successor to AlphaZero - DeepMind’s algorithm developing strategies for games that cannot be solved or heuristically optimized. This once again outlines a powerful pattern for AI training - simplify and regularize a real-world problem into a game, then let AI master this abstract but interpretable environment.

this was my simply observation when i gave the question some thought a few years ago, and as I've continued to observe the nature of intellect. I don't consider myself to be a super genius, just very mentally patient, it's something that anyone can do, Anyone can introspect and observe the principles of our thinking. When people argue for free markets they don't mean literally anything goes, they just mean that, as hayek observed, that people's natural manifestations of what to do, to supply ourselves with what we want and need tends to be the best. central planning as never succeeded, not because in a utopist sense it wouldn't be nice for everyone to be equal, but because it's impossible to execute. It leads to shortages, price hikes, and still a hierarchial priviledge, just one based on who you know. Open societies with few top down restrictions tend to be more egalitarian, even if they aren't perfect, with openness comes risk, but still it's better than expecting that leaders can be built up to an understanding of all the problems, in the attempt to control things they don't understand, leaders make problems worse

−1

Cunninghams_right t1_iuwwlqe wrote

>Open societies with few top down restrictions tend to be more egalitarian

that's not true. Nordic countries have above average top-down controls and outperform "more free" markets like the US in spite of the much higher overall wealth of the US. there is clearly a middle ground that is ideal, simply by looking around the world at developed countries and which ones are most stable, happy, educated, etc.

3