Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

slickhedstrong t1_ivezr9h wrote

the revolution of men versus robots never goes man's way

16

uasoil123 t1_ivf101i wrote

I dont care about robots actually doing the work...I just want the robots to be used so humans enjoy more time with friends and family.... really capital owners are basically creating the nuse that will be used to end themselves

7

MilkshakeBoy78 t1_ivfalmi wrote

if i get replaced by a robot, i won't get paid anymore. all the time in the world doesnt mean much when you dont have money to enjoy that time.

8

uasoil123 t1_ivfbc05 wrote

I agree, this thought I had implies you have enough resources to get your needs met, place to live, stuff to eat, ect.

7

Tencreed t1_ivfe430 wrote

Or to put a roof above your head and eat.

2

MikeofLA t1_ivfhrcb wrote

I don't know man, machine intelligence is likely to be very different than ours. They might be able to utilize all of human history but being creative, or unpredictable in a real sense will take a lot longer. And uncreative, predictable enemies are relatively easy to defeat. Also, we're immune to EMPs.

3

JournaIist t1_ivgjmj6 wrote

Nah, computers learned pretty quickly how to consistently beat humans in a game such as Dota 2, which is more akin to the type of "creativity" you're talking about than say chess. If they can do that, it wouldn't take them long to figure out how to do it in the real world if given a clear objective. Particularly, since they could run thousands of simulations a day just to "learn."

Sure when playing against humans the AI was got once or twice but it wasn't long before it was basically unbeatable.

Also, humans may be "immune" to EMPs but there's a lot of stuff we need that computers don't (i.e. drinkable water and oxygen) and a lot of stuff that we're vulnerable to that computers aren't (poisons, gasses, etc).

2

Test19s t1_ivf96sv wrote

It should really be working men vs. corrupt leaders that replace them with robots and don’t share natural resources.

1