Submitted by darth_nadoma t3_zx1ln0 in Futurology
Jack04trades t1_j1yyl3l wrote
Reply to comment by Bugfrag in Russians did such a good job promoting renewable energy and electric vehicles this year. by darth_nadoma
Oh. So that's why after renewable energy being pushed forward, in this year there was lots of blackout's in USA. Damn, people. Its not green energy. Its green for your own country. But to make these solar panela and wind turbines you are making hell lots of easte as well. Also "green energy" cannot replace burning yet, its still a lot worse in efficiency. Maybe in future it'll be better, i hope. But not now.
Whiskeypants17 t1_j1z3j2i wrote
Are you sending this from a coal mine? Might want to check on your oxygen supply friend
Jack04trades t1_j1z4pdf wrote
Nuclear, gas stations are the main source of energy yet on the planet. France has 6 of them for a reason.
neglectedselenium t1_j20cq87 wrote
Yeah but it gets billions of $$$, massive community outrage and million years to construct a single nuclear plant. So hell no, no politician can afford to waste their points on that
Jack04trades t1_j22isbt wrote
Nuclear plant takes 5 to 10 years to build. And in Russia we invented and already using a new process of reusing nuclear wastes again. So it's basically almost endless nuclear energy right now. And you forgetting one thing: in previous comment i told i hope green energy will bece truth. But its not green now at all. You just dont know some little things about it, and most of you dont care. Because its green for you, not for the place where its produced. For example parts of wind turbines made nano carbone texture, which cannot be recycled, so its just buried into the ground. But politics will not tell you that, because its just gives as much dollars as nuclear plants.
Bugfrag t1_j1zetbo wrote
>Oh. So that's why after renewable energy being pushed forward, in this year there was lots of blackout's in USA.
This argument does not make any sense at all.
The investments are being ramped up this year. Congress started to allocate the money, but that does not mean the infrastructure is completed.
If anything the blackouts indicates that a majority fossil fuel based approach is insufficient. Additional infrastructure is needed.
>Damn, people. Its not green energy. Its green for your own country. But to make these solar panela and wind turbines you are making hell lots of easte as well.
The main difference is that renewable waste is isolated during production but clean during its operational liferime. Waste generated for Coal, as a comparison, happened during (a) mining (b) refinement (c) transport (d) continuously while it's burned to generate energy.
>Also "green energy" cannot replace burning yet, its still a lot worse in efficiency. Maybe in future it'll be better, i hope. But not now.
Comparison between efficiency of the two technologies makes absolutely no sense
Efficiency of renewables is different compared to fossil fuel efficiency. For solar, if we don't capture the energy, the sun will still shine. For fossil file power plants, ~70% of the energy generated are burnt away/lost as heat.
[deleted] t1_j1z1oai wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments