Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

masterile OP t1_j6ch8gj wrote

From an economical stand point you will not have any incentive to enhance human obsolete capabilities. You would rather invest in enhancing AI-based more advanced and productive capabilities.

−3

nameTotallyUnique t1_j6chrbd wrote

Would you not buy a product that enhance your capabilities?

3

masterile OP t1_j6cikvt wrote

Yes, the same way people invest in playing better at chest. But if any professional player wants to find the best move will use a chess program.

1

khamelean t1_j6chrgt wrote

That’s making some pretty big assumption with absolutely no basis.

2

masterile OP t1_j6ciepk wrote

I was assuming for the sake of argument that human capabilities have been surpassed. I think the rest follows based in economic incentives.

1

khamelean t1_j6civce wrote

Economics incentives are a human concern. Once humans capabilities are surpassed, all the rules we know about economics go out the window.

4

masterile OP t1_j6cj1pv wrote

Nobody is going to hire a programmer to do a job a machine does in no time for virtually no cost.

6

gaudiocomplex t1_j6cs9pl wrote

The idea that more jobs are coming out of this is beyond absurd.

2