Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Shiningc t1_j6cmhsh wrote

Dafuq do you think "AI" is? Just a magical genie that will magically create everything?

25

Armano-Avalus t1_j6cpk9m wrote

Unfortunately alot of people that don't understand the technology will think it's that simple.

9

ParmAxolotl t1_j6cw8vr wrote

Is this why everyone's been hating on AI so much recently?

1

Armano-Avalus t1_j6cxexy wrote

Probably. Alot of people seem to be fearmongering since they think the singularity is actually 5 years away.

3

Ze_Bonitinho OP t1_j6dagwt wrote

What exactly do you think I mentioned that is so far-fetched?

8

Zemirolha t1_j6cnsnu wrote

If it has data and it copies logic from an excelent writter and director after some interviews, it is not magic; It is an inevitable result.

It is like virtually cloning someone.

Maybe it is easier having multiple bots with individuals logics than having a single one that understand all of them (at least on beggining of tech). Less chance of having bizarre and no history related scenes

1

Armano-Avalus t1_j6cq50d wrote

You seriously think that in the future AI can hear 3 seconds of Stanley Kubrick talking and suddenly it can make films just like him?

−1

Ze_Bonitinho OP t1_j6d0h7b wrote

I'm not saying it can take the places of the most creative stances, only those who only follow orders. Every day AI technologies get cheaper while movie industry is one of the richest. I'm not saying that if you would put in it a lot of Tarantino movies you would have a Tarantino bot. What I am saying is that you could feed it with Harry Potter excerpts and it would create the most reliable Harry Potter face possible,way closer than Daniel Radcliff's. If you have technologies that simulate the movements of the human body you wouldn't need an actual human to act as Harry Potter, instead a digital Harry Potter. During fights agaisnt monsters he could be actually wounded without cutting scenes or VFX editions

−3