Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

czk_21 t1_j5z7aae wrote

Reply to comment by StarNightLynx in AI art made me appreciate human art more by spyser

> AIs were trained by stealing work from artists.

no, thats not stealing, its same as if u were looking at pictures and took inspiration from it, everyone is free to for example try to make a painting in someones else "style", what is illegal is presenting picture u drew as work of "original" and demanding money for it

this is same for any profession where experienced person help new one to outgrow them

−1

StarNightLynx t1_j5zii80 wrote

I would argue that permanently storing mathematical representations of an artist's entire body of work to create new images in their style is completely different from "taking inspiration" from other artists. It might also be illegal, but we'll see what comes of the class action lawsuits.

5

czk_21 t1_j5zsvso wrote

how is it completely different? the artist also remember how that scenery/image looked like, they often paint it while looking at it too

anyone has right to interpret and paint what they see/saw or think about, everyone has right to learn and that should aply to AI as well

1

Hostilis_ t1_j610t1y wrote

They're not storing "mathematical representations" in the way you think they are. They're storing neural representations. The neural networks used in these models are based on the brain. So it is actually very similar to how real artists take inspiration from their predecessors. These networks are not "collage machines" piecing together snippets from other artists' work.

0