wwarnout t1_j4nfzjf wrote
I can't imagine a situation dire enough, short of one that kills the majority of the human population.
ApprehensiveCut2058 t1_j4ocoro wrote
So like the current trajectory, but not annoyingly played out over decades, way beyond our attention span.
ourstobuild t1_j4pz1fg wrote
There is no way even a threat that kills the majority of the human population would enable countries to find one leader. Cooperation? Maybe, but I wouldn't be surprised if even that would fall apart quicker than you'd imagine.
Influential people would just start throwing threats. If you won't do what I want you to do, I'll pull out.... etc etc.
Robot_Basilisk t1_j4p19fs wrote
I can think of one.
AdSea9329 t1_j4pnw2m wrote
i think this is very true. scares resources like catastrophes are not distributed evenly, any nation which can gain an advantage will do so to a certain extend. The day you got only a few people left, they will have to work together if they want to prosper. Look at the increasing ecological pressure, the consequence is less a collaboration than a currently still quite amicable trade war and race for technology. imo this will turn ugly once shocks of damages with significant magnitude will hit.
hannson t1_j4ozaql wrote
Yeah lets do that one!
[deleted] t1_j4rmku2 wrote
[deleted]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments