Submitted by zy415 t3_11ylumz in MachineLearning
OkWrongdoer4091 t1_je3vscq wrote
Reply to comment by ILOVETOCONBANDITS in [D] ICML 2023 Reviewer-Author Discussion by zy415
My only hope that my metareviewers will be diligent enough to reach out to the reviewers that didn't respond and ask if they'd changed their mind after reading the rebuttals. Not responding to the rebuttals destroys the purpose of rebuttal (and the review itself). If you volunteer to serve the community as a reviewer, why not commit to doing a good job of it? I wish I could contact the ACs, but the buttons are no longer available on OpenReview.
ILOVETOCONBANDITS t1_je3yo38 wrote
Yeah i feel your pain. it's a bit weird that even though a 5 this year is technically borderline accept, its basically a reject given the score distributions. And not getting a good rebuttal hurts.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments