Yeah i feel your pain. it's a bit weird that even though a 5 this year is technically borderline accept, its basically a reject given the score distributions. And not getting a good rebuttal hurts.

haha no worries. I hope with an average of 5.75 there is a decent shot of acceptance

Er we'll see soon? I guess decisions come out in april

I had a total of 4 revieiwers. Went from (6, 6, 4, 3) to (6, 6, 5, 6). The first two reviewers didn't respond at all.

Er i'm prob not the best to answer this but I think that's a pretty good score. While the AC can still choose to reject, I think you'd have like a 60% chance? Usually it seems scores of less than 5 are pretty strong reject and greater than 6.5 are pretty safe, but in the middle its more of a toss up. However, that was before the change in rating where 5 went from borderline reject to borderline accept. Now it seems this range has shifted down about a half point. So that's how I got my 60% chance estimate. Best of luck!

I similarly had a reviewer raise their score from a 3 to a 6!

If you don’t get any responses to the rebuttal, does that mean the scores will remain the same? I had a borderline paper (6-6-5-3 with conf 4-3-3-3) and the rebuttal questions were all easy to address (theory questions with well known answers) and I ran the experiments they wanted.

Rant: they should at least have a button to acknowledge they don’t need to send a message. For some of us applying for faculty or applying for PhD, admissions to these conferences make huge differences in our life. Such malaise is super stressful and really sucks for some of those who would have benefited greatly from an acceptance.

Do you guys think it would be worth to make an official comment reminding the reviewers to respond or asking the AC to do something?