FilthyCommieAccount t1_j1vx1s4 wrote
Make sure to do 100. I did 12 early and got 9/12 for paintings and thought it was trivial. I redid it and went to 100 and got 71/100. Hard but still discernable. Oddly enough I actually preferred midjourney over humans a lot of the time which made it easier to determine which ones were AI generated. Midjourney has a very distinctive style. The hardest to distinguish was Dall-E2 imho.
I wonder though if I wasn't familiar with AI art how I would fair. I used a lot of meta knowledge (midjourney oversaturates, image generators struggle with hands and eyes, image generators struggle to tell a narrative etc). I bet a rando non artist who hasn't followed AI art would score in the 50-60s range right now. Gonna send this to family and see how they score.
modeless t1_j1xw8xu wrote
71/100 exactly here too. I found Midjourney most convincing. Easiest tells I found are hands (obviously), signatures or any other lettering, malformed objects in general, and anything with symmetry or duplication. Funny that AI would be bad at duplication!
tavirabon t1_j1yce6i wrote
71% vs 75% has to be margin of error, 20 is probably just fine.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments