pinetreesgreen t1_jd64l0u wrote on March 22, 2023 at 2:30 AM

Reply to comment by [deleted] in Higher breakthrough rate lately with Covid in Maine? by BadLuckShoesie

Your own mask study said the data was bad. Did you read it?

MosskeepForest t1_jd663w2 wrote on March 22, 2023 at 2:43 AM

Looks like the mods banned me and then muted me so I can't even ask why. Apparently it's "go along with the liberals or be removed".

Congrats fascists.

pinetreesgreen t1_jd67ex7 wrote on March 22, 2023 at 2:53 AM

The data is largely from 2016. Which it states several times. The data from covid wasn't reliable bc the people were not masking with regularity. Which it says several times too. So its a pretty useless study, much like the others you just googled, I suspect.

My family hasn't had much of an issue with covid, thankfully. Vaccines had a lot to do with that I suspect.

MosskeepForest t1_jd68b62 wrote on March 22, 2023 at 3:00 AM

Looks like the mods banned me and then muted me so I can't even ask why. Apparently it's "go along with the liberals or be removed".

Congrats fascists.

pinetreesgreen t1_jd6905m wrote on March 22, 2023 at 3:06 AM

.... How can you study mask effectiveness on covid virus.... With data from before covid? I thought that was an obvious flaw that would be easy to pick up on. I guess not.

MosskeepForest t1_jd6aeyo wrote on March 22, 2023 at 3:18 AM

Looks like the mods banned me and then muted me so I can't even ask why. Apparently it's "go along with the liberals or be removed".

Congrats fascists.

pinetreesgreen t1_jd6bihh wrote on March 22, 2023 at 3:28 AM

Under "what did we find?" the author explains they used 78 studies. Only two of which were from covid. So yeah. The data is pretty bad.

You tried.

FredegarBolger910 t1_jd79boh wrote on March 22, 2023 at 10:37 AM

Like so many of the anti-mask warriors you are focusing on masks protecting the wearer rather than masks keeping infected people from spreading..