Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

motobudtender t1_j9c8qqh wrote

If you had children, you would understand why parents don’t want their children hearing this creepy shit. I wish you were as educated on the issue as you are passionate.

−46

Pirrelig t1_j9c9l4d wrote

Body parts and functions aren't creepy. Dispelling shame around stuff that isn't shameful is appropriate.

36

vodkaismywater t1_j9cblmu wrote

I, nor my fellow LGBT community members, are 'creepy shit' to learn about.

On another note, if you think by 12th grade your teenager hasn't seen more sexual nudity than a human being would ever see in their entire lifetime 100 years ago, I've a got a bridge to sell you. Proper sex education is extremely important for dozens of reasons. If you don't want your kid learning about their body, opt out. Don't take away education from other parents who do want informed children capable of safely entering the adult world.

31

Pink_Slyvie t1_j9dxyd0 wrote

>If you don't want your kid learning about their body, opt out.

I really struggle with this. Should parents be allowed to opt out of basic education, so much abuse and trauma could be avoided if they weren't. I really don't know or have an answer, but as cliche as it is, it keeps me up at night.

5

Zenith2017 t1_j9ftysa wrote

Honestly I lean towards no. And there's slippery slope and liberty implications which I appreciate. But if we're asking, does a parent have the right to deprive their child of basic knowledge necessary to function in society, I gotta say no on the same grounds as beating your kid isn't ok. Being a parent isn't free reign to abuse your child and I very much think zero real education is abuse

2

Mysterious487 t1_j9czkl8 wrote

I respectfully disagree with you. I would have appreciated these classes as opposed to the purity culture I was exposed to in my fundamentalist baptist upbringing.

13

Pink_Slyvie t1_j9dy0o3 wrote

Did you watch the lady with the duct tape, or the one with the chewing gum?

1

BeardedHobbit t1_j9cdin7 wrote

Then homeschool and keep your religious shit out of public schools. I wish you were as educated on the issue as you are afraid of things you don't understand.

11

justasque t1_j9cg2ga wrote

Just to be clear, the school mentioned in the article is a private religious school.

10

Pink_Slyvie t1_j9dy6zq wrote

>Just to be clear, the school mentioned in the article is a private religious school.

Quakers right? I know the majority still believe in a mostly Christian way, but I was under the impression that it was almost more culture than religion, but I'm not well versed on the topic.

2

justasque t1_j9cfeyo wrote

Chances are that Friends Central's curriculum is way, way less creepy than the article implies. And if your kids are little, obviously much of what the article described is of course not age-appropriate for them. I understand why you would have that gut reaction.

But by the time your kids are teenagers, it really is best for them to get an accurate understanding of how their body works, and how the bodies of the opposite sex work - not necessairily in the detail the article implies, but the basic topics should be covered.

Even if your kids opt not to be sexually active until marriage, perhaps some years after high school, they still need to know the basics as teens. And learning the basics in high school will prepare them for later in life when they do become sexually active.

The parents at Friends Central are paying $43,900 a year for their high schoolers to attend. If they don't like the sex ed curriculum, they can opt their kids out. Or they can withdraw their kids and have them attend any one of the many private schools in the Main Line area where Friends Central is located, or they can choose to home educate their kids, or hire a private tutor to educate them, or enroll them in one of the many public cyber-charter schools in Pennsylvania, or they can enroll them in the local public school (and save $43,900 a year!)

Private schools can only survive when they are very responsive to the concerns of parents. At $43,900 a year, they know the parents can take their money elsewhere. If the curriculum is out of line, or actually creepy, you can bet that the parents will let the admin know and the admin will take appropriate steps to keep the parents happy.

10

Yen-sama t1_j9du6jf wrote

I'm sorry you feel that body-positive sex education is creepy but you as a parent could opt out. Don't take that choice from everyone else.

The class was for 11th and 12th grade though. Those students are 1-2 years shy of not needing mommy and daddy's permission for things, if they aren't 18 already.

9

Pink_Slyvie t1_j9dxtzf wrote

>If you had children, you would understand why parents don’t want their children hearing this creepy shit. I wish you were as educated on the issue as you are passionate.

Hi, Have children. I want them to be educated on all of this. Goddess knows I wouldn't have made the mistakes I had if I had better sex education.

8

madmanz123 t1_j9dlvpk wrote

Hi, parent here.

This happened at a private school, was opt in and a waiver was required. You being poorly opinion is the issue here. You should probably be better educated and less passionate.

6

Zenith2017 t1_j9fbe31 wrote

Oh no! Not checks notes anatomically accurate sex education!

2

Diarygirl t1_j9f50qw wrote

I have children, and you strangers claiming to want to protect them are the creepy ones.

2