Submitted by redditornot6648 t3_ylebqd in Pennsylvania
Comments
redditornot6648 OP t1_iuxz114 wrote
I'm not sure what the Center For Voter Information (a Democrat affiliated organization) is thinking with this ad. It's a plain white piece of paper simplyifying complex issues to "yes" and "no" then following that up with "answers are more complicated than yes or no".
I legit thought this was a shadow Oz ad for a minute. This is the worst political ad I've ever seen in my life. Not to mention I'm a Registered Republican and you send me this? How exactly do you think slandering a candidate with no explanation is gonna help you not only get my vote but flip my vote?
IJellyWackerI t1_iuxzfng wrote
Define slandering
Jive_Sloth t1_iuxzi8x wrote
Looks good to me.
Fatjesus1-1 t1_iuxzid3 wrote
CVI is a non-partisan organization
tubesweaterguru t1_iuxzo4f wrote
According to themselves.
Fatjesus1-1 t1_iuxzxte wrote
Yes, In their mission statement they say “Center for Voter Information is a non-profit, non-partisan partner organization to Voter Participation Center, both founded to provide resources and tools to help voting-eligible citizens register and vote in upcoming elections.”
Lost_Found84 t1_iuy01xw wrote
If only they’d provided a source that allowed one to double check the context of their answers.
Rookie7269 t1_iuy02g6 wrote
Looked at it... read it... threw it away along with the 4 others.
Fatjesus1-1 t1_iuy0c3w wrote
They did source it
No-Setting9690 t1_iuy16d3 wrote
As oppose to the ones that just state the other is horribly wrong but provides zero on what they would do?
Lost_Found84 t1_iuy1c5n wrote
crankshaft123 t1_iuy1iyk wrote
Well, they sourced Oz's answers. Not so much with Fetterman.
--Cr1imsoN-- t1_iuy1j7d wrote
Doesn’t look all that inaccurate. I wish I got Democrat ads… all I ever get are the shitty Republican ones (you know, the ones that say Democrats will put men in girls restrooms and will take all your guns and other stuff that someone would have to be pretty fucking stupid to believe) and I’m a registered independent.
Fatjesus1-1 t1_iuy1o3h wrote
I’m not arguing or agreeing with either one of those guys but there’s 6 sources there.
Pantera1O1 t1_iuy2254 wrote
Pantera1O1 t1_iuy24u9 wrote
That trash went right into the shredder. lol
FuzzPunkMutt t1_iuy2hqh wrote
K?
coasterkyle18 t1_iuy2lh0 wrote
I mean… this is accurate
momlin t1_iuy2qni wrote
Ha Ha - I just said the same thing lol.
jmdunkle t1_iuy6ap2 wrote
Sorry that this simple factual ad isn’t to your liking. You didn’t have to say you were a Republican; it was obvious by your aversion to facts
jmdunkle t1_iuy6c8c wrote
“Saying something I don’t agree with”
InterLoper610 t1_iuyg1s5 wrote
If you dont like the verifiable/sourced facts presented in this mailer, perhaps you should reconsider your party registration.
StarWars_and_SNL t1_iuyhdai wrote
Tbh I’m pissed that Book Banning ranked higher than Abortion in the list of most important issues to Democrats.
[deleted] t1_iuyna4l wrote
[removed]
PartyLettuce t1_iuyqsm3 wrote
got the same exact thing in the mail three times in like the last month, wish they'd stop wasting paper.
[deleted] t1_iuz3yog wrote
[removed]
Guntcher1423 t1_iuz4in6 wrote
How about the one that says Fetterman is going to legalize all crime, and Oz is going to put every liberal into concentration camps?
Well, I didn't get that one, either. But I expect it any day now.
nms5419 t1_iuz527m wrote
Same here, I'll vote for Shapiro and Fetterman the day hell freezes over
BestCaseSurvival t1_iuz77uh wrote
Pretty sure ‘not liking… facts’ is why OP is a registered Republican.
UnfairAd7220 t1_iuzj4lb wrote
Got the NH version in NH. Dumbassery.
[deleted] t1_iv08ujb wrote
I honestly have no idea what you’re complaining about. Is it that you disagree with Mehmet Oz’s positions? I find this ad effective, fact-based and sourced.
What is your complaint?
Oh and it’s a Democratic ad. In case you didn’t realize your misnaming the party is a smear.
[deleted] t1_iv0dv4w wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_iv0shnh wrote
What's the issue here? There's simple questions and stances for each candidate, saying you can research further if you want a more in-depth answer. There's no weird/edited pictures, or misleading shock headlines trying to instill fear into you. Just "this is where they stand on this particular question" and, the most important part, provides verifiable sources. I wish more would look like this.
[deleted] t1_iv0snyn wrote
You must be blind. Either legally or selectively.
UnaffiliatedOpinion t1_iv3697w wrote
We're just a couple days out from the election. Most people interested in that issue have already made up their minds. The game at this point isn't to list your priorities in order, it's to say whatever wins your preferred candidate the most votes. Don't take it personally.
The time for high-minded debate has passed and all that's left is a mad dash to pick up the remaining "apolitical" voters.
Cogatanu7CC95 t1_iv3st9a wrote
Hey an ad that speaks the truth
StarWars_and_SNL t1_iv47pfh wrote
Books though? Books is what’s gonna do it?
Pantera1O1 t1_iv7iff6 wrote
So many simps on Reddit that like to be controlled and dominated, hence why they vote for big government...
Jive_Sloth t1_ivvw7h9 wrote
Because it's not an ad. It just tells their positions.
It doesn't do anything to convince you of what to believe.
Unless, maybe some things are clearly better to believe than others...
ImpressiveWing8 t1_iuxyz95 wrote
Yep got thst last week