Submitted by dotcom-jillionaire t3_yy4461 in Pennsylvania
RockyTheFlyingSaucer t1_iwsycpq wrote
Reply to comment by Jicama_Minimum in Democrats win control of Pennsylvania state House · Spotlight PA by dotcom-jillionaire
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/26/us/politics/doug-mastriano-campaign-pennsylvania.html this article says Shapiro spent 400k to help lift mastriano in the primary
Long term this is a terrible idea. Resources should be used to support your message not radicalize the base of the opposition, Hilary tried a similar strategy with trump
burritoace t1_iwu7jy4 wrote
This article is wildly misleading. They were attack ads, not promotional and not directed at GOP voters. This whole stupid story is manufactured.
BugMan717 t1_iwugqw6 wrote
The absurdity of politics now means that attack ads and promotional ads are the same ad just for different sides. I know the attack ads for Fetterman we're highlighting things I want haha.
burritoace t1_iwuiwqe wrote
Even still, the intended audiences are pretty different so I don't think it's hard to tell what each side is going for
DoctorSteve t1_iwv03v9 wrote
I said this all the time. Any attack ad against a Republican looks like a Republican ad. "This candidate will ban abortion". How does that sound?
IrrumaboMalum t1_iwtf54c wrote
https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2022/07/democrats-spend-millions-on-republican-primaries/
"In Pennsylvania’s race for governor, Democratic gubernatorial candidate and state Attorney General Josh Shapiro dropped $840,000 on TV ads highlighting the stances of Republican gubernatorial candidate and state Sen. Doug Mastriano — more than double what Mastriano spent on his own ad buys."
tyrael459 t1_iwu74qk wrote
I agree. “It’s easier to light a candle than curse the darkness.”
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments