Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Proof-Variation7005 t1_iwnqc0j wrote

Your interpretation is incorrect because it requires ignoring "having previously taken an oath" part of of that statement. That's a pretty important part of this.

My regular dumb ass leading a rebellion wouldn't be the same as someone who'd already taken an oath for the government doing the same.

−2

SweatyCockroach8212 t1_iwnxy7s wrote

Right. This is why Cicilline is looking to use the 14th Amendment to prevent Trump from being eligible to be President again. He took the oath and he supported an insurrection or rebellion against the government.

3