Submitted by Maleficent-Potato673 t3_126yi6q in Showerthoughts
mountainmanstan92 t1_jecj49z wrote
Teeth are not really the same thing as bone, pretty different structure than say a femur.
It's splitting hairs a bit, but they really are quite different.
RunsWithApes t1_jecpong wrote
It's not splitting hairs at all, in fact, teeth are closer to your hair than your skeletal system going by their germ layer origins.
mountainmanstan92 t1_jecr2iy wrote
Sure, mostly the composition components (hydroxyapatite) being present in various quantities is what I was referring to. I don't think it's fair to say there's NO similarities, just far less than most people are aware of.
Also, nice pun leading up to your fact there!
yomerol t1_jeco5c3 wrote
Just think about how they grow and develop, they are absolutely different. This shower thought is ridiculous as most posted here nowadays.
mountainmanstan92 t1_jecoa8g wrote
Yeah was trying to be nice about it, not everyone knows these things.
Broad_Interview_6087 t1_jeclohw wrote
First point is good (bones in fact are not the same as teeth) but comparing structural difference of a femur and tooth isn’t a great argument. Femur vs a sesamoid (floating) bone are also very different structurally, as are the bones in the ear
mountainmanstan92 t1_jecnlj7 wrote
Sure, just wanted to keep it simple and not dive too deep into anatomy, most people know what a femur is.
But to your point, a tooth remains equally different to a sesamoid and a ossicle, as it does to a femur, in terms of molecular comp and embryological origin. The size and macrostructure doesn't really make a difference for comparison sake here, so a bit pedantic.
[deleted] t1_jecqmzu wrote
It's not splitting hairs, bones are nothing like teeth outside of the vague similarity in surface appearance.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments