--DoReFuckMi-- OP t1_j67e76m wrote
Reply to comment by OregonKlee8367 in Everyone is wrong about footballs, it is neither the shape of a ball nor does it have any feet. by --DoReFuckMi--
Quoted from gang green nation:
"It is widely assumed that the word "football" (or "foot ball") references the action of the foot kicking a ball. There is an alternative explanation, which is that football originally referred to a variety of games in Medieval Europe, which were played on foot. There is no conclusive evidence for either explanation."
Nothing to do with length. A ball is a sphere, not oval, HANDOVAL!!
OregonKlee8367 t1_j67f51a wrote
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ball?wprov=sfla1
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Football_%28ball%29?wprov=sfla1
I haven't decided that's how it is... Plz no ouchies 🤕
EDIT: what kind of serious source of information is this green nation ? And was it the only source you used or just the most supportive?
--DoReFuckMi-- OP t1_j67g32h wrote
I mean I see your point, but handoval is funnier
OregonKlee8367 t1_j67h5dc wrote
That's a point you get without great debate. So it evens out and some fun was to be had
--DoReFuckMi-- OP t1_j67hcpf wrote
Seems like handovals will never be standardized :(
OregonKlee8367 t1_j67hqv8 wrote
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hands_Oval?wprov=sfla1
At least not like you wanted...
--DoReFuckMi-- OP t1_j67i073 wrote
It's close enough!! I'll take it!
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments