Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

arrouk t1_j8mb4ws wrote

There simply isn't enough resources to make them cheaper.

There isn't enough dug out of the ground to supply enough ev to everyone who has a vehicle.

Electric vehicles cannot replace the vast majority of commercial uses.

There isn't the infrastructure to charge all these ev.

There isn't a way to charge most of these ev.

There isn't enough green energy available so we would be using fossil fuels to charge a vehicle so they don't use fossil fuels.

As much as I agree we need to move away from fossil fuels there needs to be a lot more planning and thought before this kind of thing actually occurs.

12

Kiriann t1_j8mt368 wrote

> There isn't enough green energy available so we would be using fossil fuels to charge a vehicle so they don't use fossil fuels

From what I recall, the efficiency of gas ICE vehicles' engines is so bad (less than 30% energy used) that even if you used a oil driven electric generator to charge a electric vehicles that would still be more energy efficient overall.

It doesn't matter that we would, for now, have to generate energy via non-green power plants, because the overall energy efficiency would still be better (60% energy efficiency) Also, it's far easier to handle pollution in a single place than to have each individual vehicle having their half-assed filters.

People also forget the energy lost converting oil to gas, and also the distribution itself creates pollution

1

arrouk t1_j8muzpc wrote

Let's not forget all the inefficiency in the manufacture of those vehicles and the efficiency of the power being generated.

1

Kiriann t1_j8mwe4w wrote

> efficiency of the power being generated

That's what I said. Power plant are far more energy efficient than ICE vehicles (around 60%), and the electric car itself is about 90% energy efficient.

> Let's not forget all the inefficiency in the manufacture of those vehicles

Which would be almost the same as an ICE vehicle? Besides that, electric vehicle should last more than ICE ones.

An ICE vehicle transmission has around 20 moving parts in it's transmission, requires oil chance and a lot of maintenance. Electric vehicles' transmission consists of 3 parts and require way less maintenance.

A good battery also lasts a long time. TESLA batteries average capacity after 10 years of usage is around 90%.

Even the brake pads are better conserved in electric vehicles because of their electromagnet regenerative breaking.

1

arrouk t1_j8n27oz wrote

No the carbon foot print of an ev is far higher than that of a conventional combustion engine car, especially when you also factor in the shipping of parts around the world to allow for construction.

Electric was never a good option tbh, the funding would have been far better spent developing hydrogen or bioethonol systems, bioethonal being very close to petrol but more efficient in volumetric efficiency and close to carbon neutral over a 3 year cycle with the added bonus of it being possible to also convert existing petrol vehicles lowering the costs over the next 10-15 considerably. Diesels can also be run on different heavy oils such as peanut oil, lowering their carbon foot print considerably

Edit because u/mjfi4cp2 blocked me.

>I actually thought it was closer to 4x the energy.

>There isn't the investment in in the process to do it cheaper though, remember before an eccentric billionaire spent a fortune on battery technology it was unbelievably expensive to build an electric car.

0

mjfi4cp2 t1_j91fke6 wrote

Hydrogen: Using three times more energy per mile for no good reason

1

villagewinery t1_j8msssy wrote

False on all counts.

Lithium is incredibly abundant, and besides that, battery tech is evolving to eliminate rare components like cobalt and shift to sodium and iron, which are even cheaper. Next cones solid state batteries that will be more powerful, safer, and last even longer.

Most EV owners charge at home on standard infrastructure.

Night time load (when EVs are usually charging) helps utilities and actually smooths out grid loads and electricity pricing.

0

arrouk t1_j8mtvhj wrote

I disagree and would love to read some professional articles that have evidence and reference to fact for what you are saying.

I'm in the electrical industry and we are being told the opposit.

Also charging at home becomes difficult when many park on the street.

3

mjfi4cp2 t1_j91fg4h wrote

Amazing. Every word of what you just said was wrong.

0

arrouk t1_j91l66t wrote

Yet you don't leave a single argument against it.

1

mjfi4cp2 t1_j91ldn5 wrote

It takes less effort for you to be wrong than it does for me to correct you in detail.

1